User talk:JustBill2004

JustBill2004, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi JustBill2004! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Shark Tank (Australian season 4)[edit]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Shark Tank (Australian season 4). It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robby.is.on Can you recommend to me which site in Australia is reliable? For example, is https://www.mamamia.com.au/, http://smartcompany.au/, https://www.news.com.au/, ... or all of the pitch's websites are reliable to be cited? I am just a student all the way from South East Asia and I am still new to Wikipedia editing, but I just want to make the page the most reliable detail possible without unintentionally spamming due to pitch's products and its websites. Also, I have just added a Youtube citing video on the section of Episode 1, the "Coconut Bowls" pitch. Could you or someone else please check if it is in format? Thank you--JustBill2004 (talk) 14:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not very familiar with Australian media. mamamia.com.au looks like an entertainment website, I wouldn't rate it too highly. smartcompany.au doesn't load for me. I have come across references to news.com.au, should be okay.

Here's some pages with general advice:

WP:RS has some information on identifying reliable sources.
WP:RSP, where WP:DAILYMAIL is also listed, is "a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed".
Wikipedia:Video links covers citing video such as those found on Youtube.

I just want to make the page the most reliable detail possible without unintentionally spamming due to pitch's products and its websites That's a good attitude!

Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other websites references to Shark Tank Australia[edit]

I am just adding some citations website from Australia in Shark Tank Australian Season 3, and I am considering adding The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), The Courier-Mail, The Herald Sun, The Sydney Morning Herald & The West Australian. Can anyone confirms they are reliable to be added to Wikipedia? Thanks! --JustBill2004 (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]