Jump to content

User talk:Justin047

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul P. Momtaz (July 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 09:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Justin047! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 09:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul P. Momtaz has been accepted[edit]

Paul P. Momtaz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Justin. Could you please explain how you found the unpublished draft of this article? And I was unable to find the same resolution of the logo you uploaded on the web page you stated it is from, so where did you get the logo from?

Also (sorry for all the questions!), do you have any connection to the company, any employees, or the WP:SPA editors who have previously edit the company's article (User:Binghatti and User:Waivecarry)?

Thank you, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsSnoozyTurtle: Part of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zavia345. 2A02:C7C:7201:2700:2DE9:34F:E47E:513 (talk) 16:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul P. Momtaz moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Paul P. Momtaz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
GeneralNotability (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]