User talk:K.K Khel

welcome back 2 K.K talk page!!!

Pakistan

I've got no problem with updating the information, but you MUST provide a new source that supports the updated numbers you are adding. Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources say, not personal opinions. Right now, your changes look like your opinion and will be reverted. Please give a good reliable source that supports your numbers. Ravensfire (talk) 14:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Where are you getting your numbers from? What's the source? If you continue, your edits will be reverted as nationalistic vandalism. Ravensfire (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Your recent editing history at Pakistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The three revert rule is a bright-line rule - if you revert more than 3 times in the same article in a 24 hour period, you can be blocked. You are past the 3 revert limit on Pakistan. You MUST use the article talk page to discuss the changes or you will end up blocked. Please do not revert or change the edits of others again on that article without discussing on the article talk page and coming to a consensus with other editors. Ravensfire (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

I've created a talk page section for you to discuss these changes. You will be reported for edit-warring if you continue to revert. Section is here: Talk:Pakistan/Archive 18#Ethnic group changes in infobox. Ravensfire (talk) 15:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Baltistan.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dschslava ^Δx parlez moi 15:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dschslava ^Δx parlez moi 15:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 15:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)