User talk:Kablamo boom

Welcome!

Hello, Kablamo boom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Tae-hong, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tae-hong[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tae-hong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's time for a serious warning[edit]

If you continue to use this account for nothing but vandalism and nonsense, it will soon be blocked from editing. Looie496 (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop[edit]

You seem to have misunderstood what Wikipedia is. While it is nice that you seem to be fixing your own vandalism, it does not excuse you from Vandalizing in the first place. A thread has been started at the Admins noticeboard regarding your editing habits, and unless you can show that you will stop soon you will likely be blocked from editing. Please make the right choice, and begin editing responsibly and according to the policies that you were linked to at the top of this page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask, and if you are just experimenting and want to test something, try the sandbox, rather than playing in article space. Sodam Yat (talk) 02:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Tim cussen"[edit]

A page you created, Tim cussen, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jusdafax 03:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Tim cussen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 03:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]