User talk:Kaifazam

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sockpuppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Jezhotwells (talk) 13:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Praful Bidwai, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jusdafax 05:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Praful Bidwai. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jusdafax 05:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Praful Bidwai. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Donald Duck (talk) 05:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page User talk:Donald Duck worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Donald Duck (talk) 04:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Kaifazam. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests.
Message added 13:32, 21 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to NDTV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ironholds (talk) 13:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaifazam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. All my edits are with proper, credible and verifiable sources where most of the claims made in the article has no verifiable sources. Instead of removing the those unverifiable matter,my contribution is removed and I am getting blocked. This is atrocious on part of Wiki.

2. There is no personal attacks as false claimed by 2 administrators.

Decline reason:

This is apersonal attack. In this edit, you did not provide a source and completely changed the biased wording to an equally biased wording. Here, you provide several negative assertions, but your "source" has absolutely nothing to do with anything. You've been throwing plenty of opinions and controversial "facts" into articles...and you haven't provided a single legitimate source to back anything up. Smashville^talk 14:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.