User talk:Kaimakides

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kaimakides. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! GraemeL ^(talk) 18:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:JamesRachels.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:JamesRachels.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Breyer[edit]

Hi Kaimakides. I see you want Stephne Breyer to be reassessed. You have not quite completed the steps yet. If you go to Talk:Stephen Breyer at the top of the page you will see two options (community reassessment or individual). I would suggest community since you are relatively new here. It will then be closed due to consensus and others will also leave there opinions. When you create the reassessment page make sure you relate the issues to the criteria (be aware that the criteria are not as strict as many editors own personal criteria). If you need a hand let me know. AIRcorn (talk) 11:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this is your reasoning. From that I would say you are questioning the broadness 3a, the ratings is irrelevant (the tend to favour certain fan topics). You should note that this requirement "allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics." Had a quick look at the article and I you may have a valid point, although you might want to expand on what exactly is missing in your rational to make it stronger. The referencing seems a bit weak in places too. Dont forget to let the Wikiprojects and major contributors know. AIRcorn (talk) 11:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]