Jump to content

User talk:Kaitlynraeann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Britnie Keane (March 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Britnie Keane, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Britnie Keane

[edit]

Hello, Kaitlynraeann. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Britnie Keane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disruptive behaviour with Britnie Turner

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour of Britnie Turner. As has been pointed out in my edit summaries, your contribution to that article is unsuitable because you added significant material to a biograpyhy of a livng person without sources (WP:BLP) with a promotional tone and numerous inline external links. It is also has way too much detail. -Lopifalko (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Kaitlynraeann. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Britnie Turner, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Britnie Turner. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 07:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hi Kaitlynraeann! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Britnie Turner several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Britnie Turner, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 19:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Britnie Turner, you may be blocked from editing. Storchy (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Mean as custard (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]