User talk:Kaivandoshi97

July 2024

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Jain literature have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi i m kaivandoshi i follow jain religion and i give that link which pepole can get a jain litrature so pepole can have more faith otn this wiki pedia artical Kaivandoshi97 (talk) 16:52, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the inconvenience but i know what is right and wrong information acording to jain religion because i personally follow this religion and read many of that jain litrature

so its my humble request if you dont have any query than please re-continue the link which you had deleted its useful for hole community. and i am sure that you think for utility of community Kaivandoshi97 (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should check out Wikipedia's policy on external links; the summary is that there are not very many circumstances under which they are allowed, and links to YouTube lectures of the type you added are very unlikely to be appropriate in any circumstance.

The fact that you are adding links to works all by the same person (who is also a person you have created an article about) gives the impression that your purpose on Wikipedia may be to promote this person. That's a problem. Adding excessive citations or links to a single author is against Wikipedia policy. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you sir to show my mistake but i realy apologise for it but i dont wont to promotion of this person but i thought that its a use ful infor mation for community thats why i made it but thank you to show my mistake and realy very sorry for this mistake Kaivandoshi97 (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurudev Namramuni Maharajsaheb (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurudev Namramuni Maharajsaheb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaivandoshi97! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sir thankyou for your support and yes really need your help i tried lots of time but i can not resolve this things sir can any one help me out to reach at that stage which wikipedia team required from me i really apollogies for my mistake Kaivandoshi97 (talk) 17:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]