User talk:Kakkay Abbasi

I reverted your changes at Sheikh

Hello. I think you're trying to create an article about Kakkay Abbasi. You've drafted such an article at your user page, which is fine. But you can't link articles to it until it's been published as an article. Please see Wikipedia:Your first article for information about the process of drafting an article and then eventually moving it to article space. Largoplazo (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

The same goes for User:Shekhian Mohalla. Did you think you needed to create a separate user account for each article you want to create? Largoplazo (talk) 12:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I see you paid no attention to what I wrote above and you did it again. So I reverted your edits again. Largoplazo (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Shekhian Mohalla has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shekhian Mohalla. Thanks! Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 11:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Dear Sir for Your Kindness. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 12:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 04:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Sir I have rectified the shortcomings according to your kind and useful directions. Thanks a lot to guide me. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakkay Abbasi (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Kakkay Abbasi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Sir to guide me regarding this article. I have rectified the things under you kind directions.I am seeking you kindness regarding it. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 05:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Sir to guide me regarding this article. I have rectified the things under your kind directions.I am seeking your kindness regarding it. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 05:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakkay Abbasi (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Most Respected Sir. I have reviewed article according to your valuable directions. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 10:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shekhian Mohalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shekhian Mohalla, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakkay Abbasi (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dane was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Dane ^talk 05:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shekhian Mohalla has been accepted

Shekhian Mohalla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

COI username notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Kakkay Abbasi", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Sir send a link to change my name Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Shekhian Mohalla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shekhian Mohalla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekhian Mohalla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 23:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Kakkay Abbasi

Draft:Kakkay Abbasi, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kakkay Abbasi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kakkay Abbasi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 23:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shekhian Mohalla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shekhian Mohalla, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RationalPuff (talk) 08:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Sir I request you to remove deletion tags. This article based on facts and do not go against Wikipedia Standards. I am seeking your guidance to make it better if something is needed. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 09:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Shekhian Mohalla. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I have removed the speedy deletion tags, because I don't think that the article is eligible for speedy deletion. The deletion discussion is still ongoing, however, and that template must remain on the article page until the discussion has concluded. And if another editor should disagree with me and restore the speedy deletion tags, you may not remove them. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Sir. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kakkay Abbasi, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Greyjoy ^talk 09:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Sir I am not using multi Wikipedia account. I will face the investigation. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kakkay Abbasi, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kakkay Abbasi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kakkay Abbasi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not done anything wrong. If you have blocked my account or IP address it will not be proper. I use Wifi that is used by lot of other people who have common interest. My account is many months older. I have edited lot of posts as well created articles. Block me if something wrong happened from my account. Otherwise I request to unblock my account and IP address as well. Because many persons use this wifi internet facility (IP Address) and it will be injustice to keep away those persons from Wikipwdia Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The same wifi does not explain the similarity in subject matter. 331dot (talk) 18:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If there are common interests then there would be similarity in subject matter. I assure you that this account is not indulge in Sockpuppet. Kindly review the whole matter. Kakkay Abbasi (talk) 14:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)