Jump to content

User talk:Kamleshbhabhi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kamleshbhabhi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya

[edit]

Couple of notes. First of all, a warning that you are edit-warring on Saath Nibhaana Saathiya. That's a bad thing. If your edit gets reverted, you need to use the article talk page to discuss the changes. You haven't done that. You are also at 3 reverts on that page today. We have a policy called WP:3RR that basically says if you revert the same page more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, you may be blocked for edit-warring. You are at the 3RR limit, further reverts could cause you to be blocked. Please don't go that far. Use the article talk page to discuss your edits. I'm glad you did ask TheRedPenOfDoom on his talk page about the reverts, finally, but you need to do that sooner (and preferrably on the article talk page).

Second, you need to read our page on WP:FILMPLOT. That's part of our manual of style on film articles and gives guidance on plot sections. Your version is frankly way, way past what's in the film plot MOS. Please consider that. Thanks, Ravensfire (talk) 04:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Saath Nibhaana Saathiya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ravensfire (talk) 04:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saath Nibhana Saathiya

[edit]

I am removing the content you keep adding because you seem to be purposefully ignoring the big orange sign at the top of the section that says

and the big note at the bottom of the section that says

<--Wikipedia provides a SUMMARY of the plot. NOT A PROMOTIONAL TEASER or coverage of every twist. This description has reached the MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED LENGTH. Any additional details added without condensing or removing less important content will be subject to IMMEDIATE REMOVAL. -->

Is it clear now? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]