User talk:Kanclerz K-Tech

"Lolbert" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lolbert. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#Lolbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political ideologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Integral humanism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Kraków School of Economics, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Kraków School of Economics, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus Thanks for your responce, which I have just noticed. And thanks for your reccomendation, I will make sure to do these things. I just have aquestion, what do i say for the KSE in DYK, I can't think of anything.

"Latin civilisation" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Latin civilisation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 10#Latin civilisation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Jefferson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Randolph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Cathedral (neoreaction)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Cathedral (neoreaction) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 18#The Cathedral (neoreaction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wierzchowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wierzchy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wincenty Lutosławski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcohol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrianus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hermias.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish Enlightenment

"Category:Polish enlightenment", now spelled with a lower-case "e", should be corrected to "Category:Polish Enlightenment", with "Enlightenment" capitalized, as is customary for that historical period.

Do you know how to make that correction?

Thanks.

Nihil novi (talk) 17:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the suggestion to "Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 March 30".

Thanks.

Nihil novi (talk) 17:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for telling me. Kanclerz K-Tech (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oscar Milosz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comte as a conservative

Hello. Comte was a versatile thinker, but he is usually identified as a conservative. A strict Catholic, he was a sworn enemy of the ideology of the French Revolution, which he deemed chaotic and destructive, and he sought to create a new ideology of "order," inspired by the societal ideas of the Middle Ages. Although a "progressive" in some sense, he was just as much a "reactionary." He was also influenced by conservative philosophers such as Maistre and Bonald.

As for Pareto, we may leave him out, since he himself was apolitical, although his ideas are in line with conservative thinking. See, for example, The History of European Conservative Thought (2019) by Francesco Giubilei. Trakking (talk) 12:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]