User talk:KanishkScience

January 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Metapedia, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Sir Daniel, if you please provide adequate justification as to why most left-wing websites, politicians, mediapersons or speakers are rarely labelled as Left-wing or left -leaning while every other conservative politician is labelled as hard-right in Wikipedia, as well as why Metapedia is referred to as a white supremacist neo-nazi website when they have never remarked negatively against non-whites or have praised the whites as well as they are providing full citations to each of their lines (just like Wikipedia does, but authors from another side) I can't find a reason necessary to discriminate so harshly against specific people and their ideas. KanishkScience (talk) 07:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

the current description of the website, as "Islamophobic, homophobic" clearly portrays that the writers of the website are having an irrational fear (phobia=irrational fear) of Muslim immigrants and homosexual communities. But I don't believe it would be impartial to make sure to add these kinds of leftist allegations on a website. Such fears are based on genuine crime report demographics of immigrants as well as the self-independence and sustainability of homosexual couples. If we keep allowing Wikipedia to accomodate leftist voices to such a degree then it is sure to lose it's prestige as a neutral source of information. KanishkScience (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)