User talk:KarenMerguerian
DYK nomination of Freedom House (Roxbury, Massachusetts)
[edit] Hello! Your article Freedom House (Roxbury, Massachusetts) was recently nominated at Did you know to be featured on the main page. The nomination has now been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer talk/contribs 02:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, they were taken care of (I don't remember by whom). It looks like the article is on the front page right now! Congratulations! Politizer talk/contribs 13:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
My fave help pages for footnotes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Foot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_templates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Embedded_citations
|
|
Is anyone interested in adding information to the Armenian Church page about the role of women in the church?
Greetings from a fellow editor of the Rolfing page
[edit]Hello, Thanks for chiming in on Rolfing. I see that your addition has been reverted. Don't get discouraged; this page is patrolled by some very strict editors (as is the case for many alternative medicine pages that have been deemed WP:FRINGE). While there are a handful of studies on Rolfing, they have been published in journals that are not mainstream enough to meet the WP:MEDRS requirements for sources providing evidence for health-related claims. Personally I'm not even working on that particular aspect of the article; I'm just gathering information from various secondary sources (mostly books published by mainstream publishers that summarize various forms of holistic health methods) to correct some of the factual errors and also to strengthen the quality of the article. Before I started working on it, it relied far too heavily on primary sources such as the website for Rolfing. I'd suggest you take a glance through the article's talk page; it will give you an idea of the response to edits that you can expect. Also, you can always post a proposed edit to the talk page and get consensus first which improves "sticking power." Thanks again, and happy editing! --Karinpower (talk) 02:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Thanks for participating in the Guild of Copy Editors' May 2014 backlog elimination drive! We hope to see you again in July. —Torchiest talkedits 18:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, KarenMerguerian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, KarenMerguerian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, KarenMerguerian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)