User talk:Kasare44

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kasare44, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:OttoKang, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:OttoKang[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:OttoKang, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.PLA (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.PLA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kasare44! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.PLA (November 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Tone and content are inappropriate; this is a mix between promotional editing and the tone of a manual for teenagers. Wholly inappropriate, and also missing are secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.PLA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 02:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:A.PLA[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:A.PLA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 02:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kasare44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm a subculture and IT Tech fan. I'd like to introduce new tech and trends in wiki and in my SNS. This is my first experience of editing wiki and I got several rejection of my first doc. According to the submission result, I should put advertise or select some points to get my doc accepted. So I followed the order: put advertise on the first sentence. but then my account is blocked. I think if someone put advertise on their first, doc it automatically ban the one. So I'm asking as a fan of it tech and subculture, I want to edit my interest to the place where many people can notice. BTW acceptation of first doc is super hard...

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not the place to advertise. Obviously, you have a conflict of interest, so I can't see unblocking you to write about A.PLA. Please describe what constructive, non COI, non promotional edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. committed . Kasare44 (talk) 09:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with A.PLA, since you claim that you personally created its logo? 331dot (talk) 09:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a NFT Holder of A.PLA. I'm not the insider of the company. Since they launch the service which I'm cheering for, I wanted to make some guide line and history of service.

As you can noticed, I'm a noob of wiki, wasn't sure about the range of advertisement.

If I can get rid of this situation, I'll just commit the histories and stuff.

But I'm wondering that when I just wrote down the history and features of the service, I still couldn't get submission. So is why I tried to commit all the infos which could be looked like ads.

Maybe I have to be used to the range and tones of wiki.

and this is it. Kasare44 (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will then need to immediately request deletion of the logo from Commons. Commons cannot host copyrighted images. Logos are typically uploaded to this Wikipedia directly under "fair use" rules(which does carry some restrictions like being unable to be used in drafts).

Maybe you should work for them, as you wrote perfect marketing copy for them. Writing a new article is indeed the most difficult task to attempt on Wikipedia. We usually recommmend that newer users first gain experience and knowledge about how Wikipedia operates by first editing existing articles. Do you want to edit about any topics other than AI/technology? 331dot (talk) 10:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks I gotta delete the logo files and reupload. If there's any place I can write down, I'll surely do. Kasare44 (talk) 13:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was making game for 13 years (since I was 13). Maybe about making games and its process, I can edit some points. For this field, I can call myself profession. Kasare44 (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]