User talk:KasiaNL

Mosher & Conspiracy theorists

As an anthropologist he should not be a conspiracy theorist. However, Many conspiracy theorists have Machiavellian motives. Mosher an Anthropologist with 9 children who studied the founding father bottleneck effect, he is ideologically opposed to Bill Gates philanthropic family planning efforts, add that to his 3 decade personal feud with China. Supporting the Covid-19 conspiracy served his personal desire to attack all his adversaries at once. I am clarifying this, so you know why I added that category. As of the references, He started early on ^[1], so he technically played a basal role in starting the conspiracy, in April when it was clear that covid is a real medical issue, he chose to double down and go on Fox to support the conspiracy theory. The later April interview is when he made the clear decision to but into the conspiracy theory. ToddGrande (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ToddGrande: If you put good source for this, I not opposed. I revert[1] because you add category but no text or source in article for conspiracy theorist. But you need source labeling him so, the nypost is by Mosher himself and Mosher not call himself conspiracy theorist.--KasiaNL (talk) 05:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://nypost.com/2020/02/22/dont-buy-chinas-story-the-coronavirus-may-have-leaked-from-a-lab/

Hi Kasia!

Hi Kasia, Welcome to Wikipedia! Your name suggest you are a Polish female or of Polish of origin.[2] I'm so delighted to see that! I'm planning on writing some new articles on Polish folkloric crocheting in the Kashubian region and other regions of Poland. Would you have interest in working with me on such articles? What is your main area of interest? GizzyCatBella🍁 10:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kashubian is so colorful! I maybe help with copy editing?--KasiaNL (talk) 03:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly Kasia, (can I call you just Kasia?)GizzyCatBella🍁 07:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may, it is my name. I excited to work together.--KasiaNL (talk) 07:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so happy you're excited Kasia, me likewise. May I suggest you do some copy editing into this article [3] before I publish my draft? I think Irish crochet might need some touch-ups.GizzyCatBella 🍁 09:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crochet's writing is good, not sure I can improve.--KasiaNL (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you can, consider it again Kasia. PS. By the way Kasia, you seem to be doing fundamental English mistakes here and elsewhere such as writing "I" [4] instead of "I'm" ("I excited"-you wrote) But back in December, you managed using "I am" perfectly [5] ("I am new here" and "I am not sure”) You also were able to compose these sentences in a perfect English [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. You also showed perfect English abilities correcting articles that sounded awkward to you [11] What happened? GizzyCatBella🍁 14:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if my writing confused you. Nothing much at all happened. I learned advanced English as an adult, living and working. If I am slow, methodical, I do ok. But speaking or typing fast, I can mess up.--KasiaNL (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to be sorry Kasia. It's just extremely rare that a person capable of composing flawless sentences in English [12] proceeds later to make such basic errors here and elsewhere. GizzyCatBella🍁 15:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, shall we continue discussing Irish crochet? GizzyCatBella🍁 15:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- GizzyCatBella, what a strange conversation--you sound like you're an investigative reporter, and then you go back to crocheting. Sorry, but I'm a bit puzzled. Drmies (talk) 22:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Icewhiz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KasiaNL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This wrong. I am not using multiple accounts.--KasiaNL (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that's true, then you will need to provide a plausible reason as to why the evidence indicates otherwise. 331dot (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot, I am not Jewish. I was baptized. I am very far from Israel. I am using a go-between to access websites, but I do that to protect my privacy and safety. It is not an open service. I not want my government and ISP to know which sites I access. I reverted [13] and reacted like anyone reasonable would. I suggest you look up Judeopolonia and "our tenements, your streets" (search Polish: "Wasze ulice, nasze kamienice"). This is not special knowledge, anyone who know even just little Polish know this very bad. Just like all American person know that "nigger" is unacceptable. What proof of me being myself would you accept? --KasiaNL (talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I have reviewed your request, it is now out of my hands. You are free to make another request with the above response. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KasiaNL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Jewish. I was baptized. I am very far from Israel. I am using a go-between to access websites, but I do that to protect my privacy and safety. It is not an open service. I not want my government and ISP to know which sites I access. I reverted [14] and reacted like anyone reasonable would. I suggest you look up Judeopolonia and "our tenements, your streets" (search Polish: "Wasze ulice, nasze kamienice"). This is not special knowledge, anyone who know even just little Polish know this very bad. Just like all American person know that "nigger" is unacceptable. What proof of me being myself would you accept? KasiaNL (talk) 07:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Natural born waters or not, there's clear English-language deception going on, as evidenced above and here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The same person who is pretending to speak in pidgin English above, wrote the following: "I propose omitting the podcasts from the body and linking to them as an external link. The podcasts should be of use to those who want to delve deeper into this topic." [15].

Shouldn't KasiaNL have written that as something like "I omit podcast. This link external. Podcast good to others. Important topic".

Hey Kasia, musi szsiepo stara ctroche bard ziej.

Can't keep their story straight. Volunteer Marek 08:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kasia also seems to understand very accurately what sounds "Less awkward" in English: [16]

This is the same person that later writes this:[17],[18]GizzyCatBella🍁 08:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nie od pracy, ale od złej doli głowa boli. When I take time, write slowly, I can write good English. English is not my natural born waters, but I have lived and worked in English-speaking places.--KasiaNL (talk) 08:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an observation on Google Translate, it gives "Nie od pracy, ale od złej doli głowa boli" as "Not from work, but from the wrong bottom, the head hurts". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Boing! said Zebedee it is a famous proverb, google translation is bad with proverbs. A long time ago I got a 105 in my TOFEL. The writing section was my best part, I got a 28. But there is big difference if I write fast, or if I take my time. I still don't think in English. If I take my time, I can convert my thoughts to good English with good grammar. But if I go fast, then it becomes mixed up and all the grammar is wrong. English has few inflections, but many connecting words, this is a disparity when you think in a different language.--KasiaNL (talk) 12:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not remotely plausible, as the examples given of your good English are clearly those of a fluent speaker (eg "English has few inflections, but many connecting words, this is a disparity when you think in a different language"). I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://nypost.com/2020/02/22/dont-buy-chinas-story-the-coronavirus-may-have-leaked-from-a-lab/

[1]