User talk:Kata Alreshim
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Sango123 (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
General Shoutouts from People Who Love Me In All My Amazingness[edit]
--67.151.136.114 16:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC) Hi ____ its Anne i just thought i would say hi, and by doing that change ur page! mawhhahahaha. tootles!
- Hi it's is the amazing and powerful Haze-man
AHC[edit]
Sorry, no I did not create the page... I did work to improve it from a pretty bad state about 6-8 months ago, but always under my username... good band though. DMighton 18:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt resonse. I hope to improve this article to at least GA-quality, and you've evidently contributed a lot. Thanks again. Lizardking42 18:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
24.177.15.224 01:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
−Human[edit]
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article −Human, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Nine Inch Nails[edit]
Hi there. I reverted the vandalism on Nine Inch Nails by restoring the pre-IP edited version. Hope this helps, PeterSymonds | talk 21:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I have no idea why I couldn't revert it immediately; all I know is that it was something other than an edit conflict. Kata Alreshim (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- No probs, thanks for getting the word out. Because there was more than one edit after the vandalism had taken place, you couldn't rollback because there were other edits "in the way" as it were. The undo function works for individual edits, so the only way to get it back automatically was to revert to the version unaffected by the vandalism. Best, PeterSymonds | talk 21:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- [1] Wow, thanks! Pleasure to help. PeterSymonds | talk 06:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- No probs, thanks for getting the word out. Because there was more than one edit after the vandalism had taken place, you couldn't rollback because there were other edits "in the way" as it were. The undo function works for individual edits, so the only way to get it back automatically was to revert to the version unaffected by the vandalism. Best, PeterSymonds | talk 21:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)