User talk:Katesingletary/sandbox
Peer Review Comments 9/19/2016
The first "Corrections/Ideas" section can be more concise. All of the smaller changes that could be made didn't necessarily need to be added. Also, to help conciseness you could use this section to correct one particular section instead of the entire article. The information you put in this section is very helpful for the author to see and are useful for overall clarification of the article.
For the "additions" section I think the sources are good and relevant. One of them is a little out-of-date (the one labeled as performed in 1999). I thought I remembered the experiments had to be done after 2000, but Dr. Munger would be the most useful person to ask. Also, when speaking to Dr. Munger about how to add sources, she requested there be information about the method of the experiments. That could help with clarity and relatedness. Overall good job!