User talk:Kaushal Jasani

License tagging for File:Shri Simandhar Swami.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Shri Simandhar Swami.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tirthankara

Hello. Have you seen what did Ogress in the article Tirthankara? It is near vandalism, isn't it? Have a nice day.--Zavatter (talk) 09:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pujya Deepakbhai Desai may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

archives/aug_15_2010/4772.html |deadurl=no |newspaper=INDIAN newslink |publisher= INDIAN newslink (The Fortnightly Newspaper |archiveurl= http://www.indiannewslink.co.nz/index.php/archives/aug_15_

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pujya Niruma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurangabad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pujya Deepakbhai Desai

Please don't move Deepak Desai to Pujya Deepakbhai Desai as according to Wikipedia title guidelines, we do not add honorifics such as bhai or Pujya etc. to names. See WP:NCIN for detailed information. Regards,--Nizil (talk) 11:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome for constructive edits but don't move page to another name or add unreliable references. Please note that we do not add honorifics to name of a person. -Nizil (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can go with name Deepakbhai Desai but Pujyashri is definitely Honorifics. WP:NCIN is not exclusive list of honorifics but general guidelines. I preferred Deepak Desai as Bhai is only used when the name is too short without Bhai or is used in credits. I have also added that "Pujyashri Deepkbhai Desai is used by his followers" in lead para. Hope you understand. Happy editing.-Nizil (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your other edit because it does not follow general style of encyclopedia writing as well as removal of references already in article. The lead para usually don't need refs as it serves as summary of article. Please try to add secondary sources. Please do not revert again until you discuss the issue. regards,-Nizil (talk) 12:18, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information about what type of refs are ok and what not.-Nizil (talk) 12:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Coderzombie (talk) 17:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Niruben Amin. Coderzombie (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Relevant" or "Irrelevant" is not decided by you or me or Nizil Shah. It's decided by sources. Please read about WP:Citing Sources and WP:Reliable Sources before proceeding further. Coderzombie (talk) 04:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue your disruptive behaviour in the articles, you'll be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not your propaganda website. Coderzombie (talk) 04:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kaushal Jasani. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Gazal world. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Niruben Amin. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gazal world (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kaushal Jasani. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Niruben Amin, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nizil (talk) 10:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]