User talk:Kcj5062
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Kcj5062! I noticed your contributions to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tristario (talk) 07:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
TheClubSilencio
[edit]As it turns out, they are sock so indef blocked. What a waste of time for all of us. S0091 (talk) 20:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Jai White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Elizabeth Berkley D.O.B.
[edit] Hello, I'm Quaerens-veritatem. I wanted to let you know that your recent contribution of Revision as of 16:39, 24 September 2023 has been reverted because you failed to note my edit of 12:27, 24 September 2023, and the article’s reference # 56 that is a WP:RS that was added before your edit, that confirm Birkley’s full date of birth. Please check references before editing. Disruptive editing can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 03:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Quaerens-veritatem
- I think you may wanna look up what disruptive editing actually is. The references/citations should be close to the material it supports in the article. Kcj5062 (talk) 04:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, the lead just must have support in the article, not a separate ref unless an item is challenged or likely so (MOS:LEADCITE). Certainly ref #56 could have been added to the lead if it was challenged, but it was not, it was ignored. Nonetheless, I have added it. By the way, The Gossip Column of Beaver County Times - Sunday Times Magazine - is a Kings Feature Syndicate undated column without a complete d.o.b.. The Ask Michele column in the Lawrence Journal-World likewise is an undated syndicated column without a complete d.o.b.. Again, The Nation’s Entertainment - That’s Showbiz undated column is without a full d.o.b. that appears syndicated from the LA Times. The LA Times 2012 article seems on point, but the author seems to have gained information from other sources and there is a later reference to “Ministry of Gossip”. On the other hand the article’s present ref #56 backs up Berkley and is a home town source. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Quaerens-veritatem
- You can see the dates to left of those newspapers underneath where it says "books". As well as on the top of the newspapers if you scroll down on them. The Beaver County Times one is dated May 26 1996. The Lawrence Journal World one is dated August 9 1996. And the Nation Entertainment one is dated April 2 1998. And when it comes to WP:DOB the age is the more important thing. That's why Wikipedia allows birth years to be put up, but not the birthday if there's no reliable source for. Kcj5062 (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I noted those dates but, as I wrote, the columns themselves are not dated as is usual with news articles. They appear to be syndicated columns produced by others for subscribing news organs and they don’t have their own dates and may have been produced at various times, not necessarily the date generally printed in the receiving organs. I think the original ref # 56, now ref # 1, resolves the complete d.o.b. - if you read the cite you will find it lists the month, date, and year of her birth. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Anyone can claim to be a celebrity on Twitter. It's a not a reliable source. Please don't cite it on Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- @NinjaRobotPirate
- From my understanding, the only times Twitter or any other social media sources aren't to be used is if they aren't written by the subject themselves. And that actually is Carrie Kernan's Twitter account. I even asked about this at WP:RSN a few weeks ago about social media acoounts and this was what was stated[1]
- "It shouldn't be used unless by the post is by the subject of the article themselves, see WP:BLPSPS" Kcj5062 (talk) 04:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)