User talk:Kdgaffney/sandbox
This looks like a really good start. I think it sounds encyclopedic, and does not draw any conclusions but simply states previous knowledge. I think it would be helpful to readers if you linked some of the keywords in the article to other wikipedia pages, such as the researcher Hirano who discovered Hirano bodies, the area of the brain in which they are found, and maybe even Alzheimer's disease. This would help readers who are unfamiliar with these terms to easily find out more information and to be able to put the Hirano bodies into context. I would also maybe expand about who Hirano is and possibly more of the research that accompanies this topic. I also like that there wasn't any assertions made about the connection between Alzheimer's and Hirano bodies, and that only known facts were stated and no personal assertions were added. I would keep doing research on any connections that Hirano bodies have to any other pathologies, or if there is not much more information on the subject possibly giving more background on topics that are necessary to understand in order to put it into context. -Gicoo001 (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Overall, your article looks good. I would add more general knowledge/vocab in the background section, unless you know what they are, you might not understand some of the terminology. Also, you should put in some links to other wikipedia articles, that would be helpful to others reading it. The sentences are a little choppy and are a little like individual statements, you should include some summary sentences to kind of bring everything together, if that makes sense. The information in the articles looks good. Mejoh004 (talk) 01:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Review
[edit]I really like the way your article is structured, and I think when you move the information to the mainspace, you should also reorganize what is there (in short spurts, of course, so others can review your changes!). I would recommend putting the third paragraph you have now into the background. Interesting topic! ProfJRL (talk) 23:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)