User talk:Kedar Pandey

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at User:Kedar Pandey. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. It looks like you have a conflict of interest. If you do, you have to disclose what interests you have related to a specific person and/or thing. Thank you. —Bey WHEELZ ^Let It _RIP!✉📝^Sign 23:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kedar Pandey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a Mistake. I Am Not Suman Kumar Mallick,I am paid by him to be his assistant at work including edits to wikipedia and writing "Suman Kumar Mallick" page on behalf. I Did Not know he was block for doing wrong but I should not suffer,No? Kedar Pandey (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to be editing under the direction of someone who may be blocked on Wikipedia - that's a big no-no... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have recreated exactly the content of a blocked user, in violation of WP:MEAT and WP:BLOCK. Please tell him that there's no way for him to get that page created while he keeps on evading his block. Until his original account is unblocked, we will keep on deleting any content he attempts to force on Wikipedia. It's been a while since I've seen someone as abusive as this, with this many instances of block evasion in such a short time. --Yamla (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note that you, too, have engaged in copyright violation, placing Wikipedia in jeopardy. --Yamla (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: I'll note that this user did in fact declare paid editing. See here. Doesn't excuse the copyright violation or the editing on behalf of a blocked user, mind you. But hey, small things. --Yamla (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla - Thank you - I updated my decline statement. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kedar Pandey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, I note that "Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not". I am not using accounts for illegitimate reasons , I am using multiple accounts to improve Wikipedia so my reasons are legitimate .I am not breaking rules , Please unblock . Kedar Pandey (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Evading a block, or working for someone who is, is an illegitimate reason by itself. It doesn't matter if your edits are good or not- which they aren't anyway. You should only be using one account. As long as you are intent on creating or using more than one account(or working for someone who is), there is nothing else to discuss. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 23:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.