User talk:Kedarj71

Your submission at Articles for creation: Night School (2012) (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Night School (2012) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kedarj71, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 05:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Night School (2012) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Night School (2012), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahi Anil Barve (May 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: For reasons please have a look at,

What are reliable sources WP:RS
Who is notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia WP:NARTIST
Why this article got rejected several times Wikipedia:Too soon
Additionally we strongly discourage promotional/advocacy/web-hosting WP:NOTADVERTISING

Please read these policies to know why we haven't accepted your draft, you are welcome to contribute further. thanks

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 03:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kedarj71! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 03:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]