User talk:KeineMelon

Welcome![edit]

Hello, KeineMelon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 08:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones[edit]

The article Game of Thrones you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Game of Thrones for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Mother's Mercy"[edit]

Thank you for your contributions, but please do not move the article "Mother's Mercy" (episode 50 of Game of Thrones) without checking the Futon source first - the episode is titled "Mother's Mercy", not "Mothers' Mercy". Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian 02:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kim Wexler for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kim Wexler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Wexler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Alex^TW 13:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chuck McGill for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuck McGill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck McGill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Alex^TW 13:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Polyamorph. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neil Parish have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Polyamorph (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you read up on the policy on biographies of living people. Further violations will render you liable to a block. Mjroots (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mjroots Totally accept that my edit was unacceptable, but I couldn't resist having a little fun. I wasn't expecting it to stay very long, and it didn't (less than a minute), so no real harm done. KeineMelon (talk) 01:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resist harder next time. Administrators had to come in and scrub the record. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]