Jump to content

User talk:Kellychi4u

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! TRL (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Trlovejoy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:List of historical anniversaries because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TRL (talk) 16:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Stevietheman. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Big Brother Naija have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. refspam Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:44, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wapbaze for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wapbaze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wapbaze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster talk 21:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 02:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm HandsomeBoy. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Regina Daniels have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

[edit]

The article was deleted through the deletion discussion you were notified of above as not notable enough for Wikipedia, and I'm not going to reinstate an article that the community has decided doesn't have a place here. If you think you can show it to be notable, you will need to write a new version with proper references. Also read the following regarding writing an article.

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to an organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
  • there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
  • If you have an obvious conflict of interest you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kellychi4u. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kellychi4u|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elite Precast Concrete Limited

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elite Precast Concrete Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Gokhshtein moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, David Gokhshtein, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Gokhshtein (November 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GSS 💬 03:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Grof

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Martin Grof requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS 💬 07:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Grof

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Martin Grof requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS 💬 11:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Kellychi4u, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kellychi4u|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS 💬 11:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have disclosed your paid status on your user page, but you have not yet disclosed who is paying you to edit, who the client is, and link(s) to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Please do so before making any further edit per WP:PAID to comply with full disclosure guidelines. GSS 💬 17:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephon Dupree Warren for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephon Dupree Warren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephon Dupree Warren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew Base (talk) 15:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to National Testing Service‎. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GSS 💬 04:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've undone everything

[edit]

You've made it look like I've been spamming Wikipedia, if you've checked well, I have been helping, you think it's everything I got paid for? I'm a normal Wikipedia editor, it's not everything I got paid for, if you checked my link at my user page you'll know that even my freelance website, I do not get orders, I just put it there to avoid your ban cos I know you can do it. Kellychi4u (talk) 04:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? how you own this image? what was the purpose of adding this link? do you advertise Wikipedia anywhere else except Seoclerk.com? GSS 💬 04:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Only seoclerk, please send me links on how to be a good editor, I can see you're highly experienced, please stop bringing me down, it's causing me sever headaches Kellychi4u (talk) 04:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Upwork profile would seem to disagree... want to change your answer? Yunshui 雲水 09:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
please if you have a link provide it because the last time I logged in, I am not doing anything there Kellychi4u (talk) 12:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Proving a link would be outing, which I'm not going to do. However, your profile there begins with this text: Skilled Wikipedia Editor with programming experience. I am a passionate Wikipedia editor / page creator and a BSc holder of computer science. Since 2014 I have worked on Wikipedia to analyze and edit dead links, create images, create pages and add reference in pages. You don't consider that to be advertising? I do. That you aren't getting any work out of it is irrelevant: the policy clearly states: "Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services." So that's one other site where you advertise and which you haven't disclosed; how many more are there? Yunshui 雲水 14:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please I want you to understand that I filled that at my profile and still now the profile is not allowed approved at upwork, the only working profile is the one am using at SEOCLERK, I cannot start giving links of what is not working but if you want me to put it, I will. Kellychi4u (talk) 14:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are advertising a Wikipedia editing service with it, and it is publicly visible - you therefore need to list it. You also need to fix the disclosure on your userpage regarding work obtained via SEOclerk, which does not meet the requirements set out in WP:PAID: you are obliged to list every client and article, not just the site through which you got the job. Yunshui 雲水 15:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you give me example of how am going to do this, Please help me. "which does not meet the requirements set out in WP:PAID:" Kellychi4u (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you cannot comply with the requirements for paid editors, you may not edit here. It is not my job, as a volunteer, to help you make money off the backs of others' work. Either read and comply with the policy on paid editing disclosure, or expect your account to be blocked. Yunshui 雲水 11:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please check my user page User:Kellychi4u if it is now compliant, I will be happy to hear from you even if they are corrections. Thanks Kellychi4u (talk) 11:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not. You must list all articles for which you were paid, together with the individual or company that paid you. Yunshui 雲水 12:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please sir, check it again and if it's good, and tell me what next I should be doing upfront, I will not like to be banned sir. Am a family man,Kellychi4u (talk) 14:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is still not correct. Have you even read the paid editing policy? It is extremely simple - for every article for which you are paid YOU MUST DISCLOSE YOUR CLIENT AND YOUR EMPLOYER. If you are not capable of understanding this basic requirement, then you are evidently not competent to edit here. Unless your next edits correctly disclose ALL of your employers for each article where you have taken payment for editing, I will be blocking your account rather than responding to messages here on your talkpage. You are wasting my time and that of other volunteers, and unlike you, we don't try and cash in on our work here. Yunshui 雲水 18:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please sir do not block me, I read everything but am talking with you personally to deeply understand the rule. you told me this "No, it is not. You must list all articles for which you were paid, together with the individual or company that paid you." and I disclosed my previous edits on my talk page, if it's wrong again, you let me know. as for disclosing my employer details. Is it on my next article or I must also disclose my other written aritcles? should I disclose them on my talkpage or on the summary, Please if we can chat on whatsapp/any other means, to know more about this it will be lovely. PLEASE NO BLOCKING Kellychi4u (talk) 19:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. You've had more chances than most people get, but on review, it's very clear that your primary purpose here is to make money from editing, and to that end you have repeatedly added inappropriate content to Wikipedia at the behest of your clients. Other editors - volunteers - have had to spend time cleaning up the mess that you have left through your inability (or straight-up unwillingness) to comprehend Wikipedia's policies. You are a net negative to the project, and are clearly not here to help create an encyclopedia. Your account is blocked indefinitely. Yunshui 雲水 20:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand, You really tried for me. Thanks Kellychi4u (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir, easy

[edit]

I Kellychi4u (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir easy,

[edit]

Please send me link to be a better editor, I can see you're highly experienced, stop bringing me down, it's causing me sever headaches Kellychi4u (talk) 04:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I still contribute to Wikipedia?

[edit]

I want admins to answer if I am eligible to contribute to Wikipedia currently. or if am still under sanctions Kellychi4u (talk) 14:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stephon Dupree Warren

[edit]

Please admins, can this page of Stephon Dupree Warren be reviewed? Kellychi4u (talk) 08:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Account Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kellychi4u (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please I was only seeking guidance to the right part to avoid wikipedia violation and I was blocked because I asked too much questions, Please unblock me so I can be better editor, I love Wikipedia, I love editing, I was only paid for some pages and I was trying to be compliance and disclosed my employer's details, I might have not done it well and admin got angry and blocked me indefinitely, Please help me.Kellychi4u (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery me! 01:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Account Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kellychi4u (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because my main purpose here is to make money from editing pages, I feel ashamed cos I was not here too to contribute, I pledge my loyalty from now onwards to be a good editor, to follow Wikipedia guidelines and contribute for free on my free time and to also declare in good faith whenever I was paid to make any edit, I will disclose my employers details, I wish to be given one more time by wikipedia to see if am here to be good or bad please, We learn everyday and this I have learnt today. Kellychi4u (talk) 01:20, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you, so you will at least in the short term need to find another career option. I think your only pathway back is the standard offer. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of DJ MOZA

[edit]
Notice

The article DJ MOZA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability; the only source that has so much as a single sentence of content about DJ MOZA is an interview with his collaborator. Everything beyond mere credits is unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David Gokhshtein

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David Gokhshtein, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Gerard (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reece Chowdhry

[edit]

Hello, Kellychi4u. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reece Chowdhry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kellychi4u&oldid=1256846997"