User talk:Kelseypedia
September 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Babblingqu. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 03:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I did. Don't worry about it. That's just usually not a good way to go about it. Putting stuff like that on his page is exactly the kind of thing that type of person wants -- they just come here to attract attention. See Wikipedia:Deny recognition. He's been temporarily blocked, and will probably go away. -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 04:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting records
[edit]Regarding the voting records of subjects of the Congressmen whose articles I edited. I did not add the voting record statistics to the the articles of all vulnerable Democrats. What I was intending to do was simply add balance and context to pages that gave undo weight to votes where the member of congress deviated from the party line, by showing the true percentage of the time when that member voted with their party. If you checked, each article that I edited lists votes, or positions that the member of congress took that was contrary to the party line. And by the way WP:AGF. --Tdl1060 (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Show me where it says that in order to edit one page, that I must check every other related page and make sure that the same content is present in all other pages. There is nothing biased about what I added, and it is properly sourced. All that I have done is provide context, and balance where it is lacking. As I have previously stated the only articles that I added the party-line voting statistics were ones that gave undo weight to specific votes or positions. You have yet to show me any policy that I have violated. You on the other hand have violated WP:AGF, and if you followed through on your threat WP:EWIS.--Tdl1060 (talk) 17:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- First you asked "what balance was lacking". This question I have already answered by stating that the articles that I added the statistics in question to, gave undo weight to certain votes or positions. Your claim that I only added the party line voting statistics to vulnerable Democrats does not hold water either, because no-one currently views Dan Boren as being vulnerable. Finally, if you feel that there is a congressperson's article that gives undo weight to certain votes or positions, that you believe could be balanced by adding party line voting statistics, you are free to add them as well. Otherwise you have proven that you have no case to complain about the edits in question.--Tdl1060 (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Show me where it says that in order to edit one page, that I must check every other related page and make sure that the same content is present in all other pages. There is nothing biased about what I added, and it is properly sourced. All that I have done is provide context, and balance where it is lacking. As I have previously stated the only articles that I added the party-line voting statistics were ones that gave undo weight to specific votes or positions. You have yet to show me any policy that I have violated. You on the other hand have violated WP:AGF, and if you followed through on your threat WP:EWIS.--Tdl1060 (talk) 17:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)