User talk:Kenrosewall

Don't tellthemisses and Don't tellthemissus

Please note that both Don't tellthemisses and Don't tellthemissus have been deleted because I was unable to determine the actual name of this racehorse from looking at both articles and the only source provided had no direct reference to this horse. If you have sources to support this horse's notability, you can re-create the article at the correct name. --Metropolitan90 03:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Don't tellthemisses which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. JuJube 03:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Warning struck per User:JuJube's comment at User talk:Metropolitan90#Don't tellthemisses. --Metropolitan90 03:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I am an administrator, and I told this editor (above) that he could re-create the article at the correct name if he had sources to support the horse's notability. While this horse may not be notable, I disagree with the warning above. --Metropolitan90 03:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- So does that mean the article will not be deleted?
  - No, it probably still will be deleted. I looked at the two new links, and the races they described did not show this horse as one of the entries. So there still aren't any reliable sources yet. Furthermore, this horse has only been in two races, never won, placed, or showed in them, and has only won $450. So the horse does not seem to be notable yet, either. If the article is deleted, I would recommend that you wait for the horse to attain some actual success or receive some actual news coverage (not just being listed in the results of a race it was in) before making any further attempts to re-create the article. --Metropolitan90 03:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Thanks mate. Why does it have to be notable to appear on Wiki? There are many articles which are less notable. It is notable for being the off-spring of Arazi. I'm not sure why the references do not mention the horse but I will look into them. Thanks again.

License tagging for Image:Dont tellthemisses silks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dont tellthemisses silks.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Donttellthemisses2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Donttellthemisses2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Donttellthemisses2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Donttellthemisses2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]