User talk:Kentansg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kentansg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Uncletomwood (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Straus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Straus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Straus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

db-author[edit]

You are not the only substantial contributor, so db-author is inapplicable. DGG ( talk ) 00:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Cancer Letter Vol 16 No 32 1990.pdf[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Cancer Letter Vol 16 No 32 1990.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI[edit]

Based on the nature of your contributions to WP, I think it appropriate to remind you of our rules on WP:Conflict of Interest, and in particular our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. I can go into more specifics about why I am giving you this reminder, if it isn't clear to you.

Please also be aware that our bLP rules apply to all living people mentioned in an article, not just the subject of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Straus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Straus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Straus (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GhostDust (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]