User talk:Kentuckian/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FatCat96. Thank you for your work on 2023 Paris gas explosion. User:Actualcpscm, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Good catch on this! I nominated it for ITN, although the article may be a little sparse at the moment. Still probably deserves a mention there. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Actualcpscm (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 Paris explosion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Paris explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Paris explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ad Orientem (talk) 20:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced birth dates

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted a change you made to Lauri Hendler. In this edit, you added a birth date, but you didn't cite a reliable source. Wikipedia has strict rules on content in biographies of living persons because this can impact real peoples' lives. Please be aware that many sites on the internet purport to give information about celebrities, but few of them of reliable. Sites like the IMDb use user-generated content, and they should not be cited in biographical articles. Similarly, celebrity gossip websites should not be used because most of them don't have a history of fact checking or publishing corrections. Fan sites and blogs are self-published and have no editorial control. We also can't use primary documents, such as government birth databases or genealogical websites (which are also typically user-generated, as above). This means that the number of available sources is quite slim, and we often have to either go without this information or wait until a source like Entertainment Weekly or the BBC publishes an interview that includes a birth date. If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FatCat96. Thank you for your work on Elmer Begley. User:Curbon7, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great start! In case you do not know, through WP:The Wikipedia Library, we have access to newspapers.com, which is an excellent resource for these sorts of biographies.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Curbon7}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Curbon7 (talk) 04:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samuel Wilber Hager

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Samuel Wilber Hager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samuel Wilber Hager

The article Samuel Wilber Hager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Samuel Wilber Hager for comments about the article, and Talk:Samuel Wilber Hager/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FatCat96. Thank you for your work on Newton Willard Utley. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating and expanding the article on Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop undoing my edits

Dude please stop messing with my wiki page, I’m trying to get a corporate job and am trying to scrub my wiki of anything that would cast me in a bad light. Please stop touching it. 2600:1700:31E0:3F8F:1C49:2A3C:33BA:6BD0 (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop removing information from the Louis Smolka article. Please know that Wikipedia is not censored for the benefit of any particular group or person. FatCat96 (talk) 01:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
You are being unreasonably idealistic right now. I am not asking you to scrub the internet. I understand you want wikipedia to be a beacon of truth and you may add it back if it becomes pertinent, but I don’t think it has any relevance to anyone’s understanding of theetruth 2600:1700:31E0:3F8F:44F2:20DA:5CF4:6849 (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Hiram, Kentucky

Thank you for creating Hiram, Kentucky. Are you able to locate a source supporting that anyone ever lived in Hiram? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, its page on the GNIS identifies it as a populated place. If you go to Google Earth and find Hiram, you can clearly see that there are people living there. FatCat96 (talk) 02:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Maps and GNIS cannot be used as proof that a place is populated, per WP:NGEO. Is the something in a book or reliable source showing that people have lived here? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
The book says that Hiram had a post office for over 20 years, it also says that it was a coal camp, which means that people have and continue to live there. I'm not sure how reliable this is, but it gives an estimated population for the community, and this source gives demographics. FatCat96 (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Neither of those are reliable sources. I also wasn't able to find a reliable source to support that Hiram ever had a population. This source said it had a post office, and was a railroad stop. I'll PROD the article, unless you object. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
A PROD is not needed. I live near Hiram, and I have to drive past the community just about twice a week. There are obviously people living there. The community has several churches, several houses, and a gas station. Now, I have given you every reason to believe that there are people living there. FatCat96 (talk) 00:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Why not just take a photo of the place next time you drive through? Schwede66 17:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi FatCat96. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Kentucky connection and quick question

Hi FatCat96, I noticed you are from the Appalachian side of Kentucky. I have occasion to be in that area as my retired parents currently reside in the town of Berea, Kentucky. Small world!

Quick question: as I am new I'm just learning but in your instructional blurb you mention an option to click a 'New Section' link at the top of this page but it appears that it currently is called 'Add Topic', is that correct? Thehoneybear (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the question! I usually don't meet too many other editors from or related to Eastern Kentucky. To add a new topic to a talk page, you just click the 'Add Topic' button between the 'edit' and 'view history' button. Wishing you a good day! FatCat96 (talk) 02:17, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Reverted change at James Farish page

Thanks for your notification that you undid my edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Farish&diff=prev&oldid=1178930523 because you considered it unconstructive. I must say I am bewildered by this reaction. I did provide an edit summary "Undid obvious vandalism", and if you look at the revision which I undid (i.e. the one where a one-time editor had added the sentence "Rumor has it that he has [sic - we're talking about someone who lived in the 1830ies] one of the largest phalluses in Bombay history") I think you might understand why I didn't elaborate any more on my reasons for qualifying this as vandalism. It is true that superficially it may have looked to you as if the statement I deleted was referenced, but if you look at either the quoted page on google books itself (which, unsurprisingly, contains no information of this kind whatsoever), or at the history of the James Farish page itself (where you will see that the editor whom I consider a vandal simply inserted the above-quoted sentence before a reference which had already been in the article before, and which only provides information on which a preceding sentence is based), you will see that there is absolutely no reason to believe the edit I removed was based on reliable sources, or indeed made with any other intention than that of making a childish dick joke. So you may understand why I am bewildered that what you chose to treat as vandalism would have been my removal of this sentence, rather than the addition of it last year. In any case I would ask you (as someone who in contrast to me is knowledgeable about the correct formalites of wikipedia editing) to consider removing the bit that I attempted to remove, or to explain to me what makes it a valid, non vandal edit that should not be removed. 2A01:C23:5D4C:8600:34B6:A570:DD6B:3E80 (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Sorry! I looked over the edit again, and I realized I made a mistake. Sorry for the mistake. Wishing you a good day! FatCat96 (talk) 02:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind and quick reply, and have a good day too! 2A01:C23:61B9:F300:D412:F7EB:EB36:6634 (talk) 02:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi FatCat96. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell A bit concerned here. New Page reviewer was just granted, and it is near impossible to miss the unambiguous copyvio at 2023 Venezuela election agreement. You don't even need to speak Spanish when the text says, "Below is the agreement signed by both parties, translated from Spanish to English". SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi @SandyGeorgia. I tried to run the article through Earwig, but it wouldn't work for me. I didn't want to tag it for speedy deletion without knowing for sure that it was a copyvio. I would also like for you to know that Venezuelan laws and proclamations are in the public domain. Hope this clears things up. Wishing you a happy and blessed day! FatCat96 (talk) 01:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
In which case, this should have been added. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
FatCat96 and HJ Mitchell I just remembered to return to this, after getting distracted for days. FatCat, my apologies for being unaware of (or forgetting) that this Venezuelan material was in the public domain. Because I rarely have occasion to cite the government, because of the issues with Venezuelan propaganda, the matter of public domain just wasn't on my radar, so I do owe you an apology, and hope your new page patrolling is going well. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lawrence W. Hager

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lawrence W. Hager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cookie dough dingus -- Cookie dough dingus (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello FatCat96:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2500 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lawrence W. Hager

The article Lawrence W. Hager you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lawrence W. Hager and Talk:Lawrence W. Hager/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cookie dough dingus -- Cookie dough dingus (talk) 01:40, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your Rollback on 1996 Tami Nadu Legislative assembly elections

I have noticed that you used rollback to revert my edit on this page. My opinion is that I have followed the policies and guidelines and have even referred to this page for the creation of the table, you could notice that both the tables are almost the same structure. If I did something wrong, I would like to know the reason why my edit was reverted. I would correct my mistake (if there is one) and would contribute to Wikipedia accordingly.

Regards,

@Polar Hyena Polar Hyena (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Polar Hyena. You removed a fair amount of information from the article. I do understand that you were trying to add a table, but I don't see why you had to remove a paragraph of information from the article. If you would like to add the table back, you are welcome to do so. 🌹FatCat96🌹 Chat with Cat 21:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear fatcat96

May you tell me how you respond so fast and how do you edit I can’t find edit thing? ): Sexy banan! (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Happy Chandler
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Happy Chandler - Harris and Ewing Crop.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 00:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

WP:DEFAULTSORT for biograpies

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I just noticed your autopatrolled request at WP:PERM and observed that you are not using DEFAULTSORT for biographies. I wanted to inform you that DEFAULTSORT is essential for biographies so you should start using it in your articles. I chose not to add this as a comment on your permission request because I didn't want to disappoint you. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lawrence W. Hager

The article Lawrence W. Hager you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lawrence W. Hager for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cookie dough dingus -- Cookie dough dingus (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi FatCat96, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/John D. White
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:John D. White - Brady Handy cropped.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 09:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Yo fatcat96 I wanna tell you this,how did you crrate this page?

I wanna create one myself. 103.175.130.16 (talk) 02:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I got a message for you

I hope this message meets you well User:FatCat96 .... review the page John Franklin (comedian) ... cheers. Wallclockticking (talk) Wallclockticking (talk) 22:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Coal tipple in Kenvir

If this doesn't pass, please renominate it in a month or so. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 05:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks! 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 04:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Ditto the coal miners' houses. This appears to just be one of FPC's occasional periods where a lot of stuff fails to reach quorum. Probably because there were a huge number of nominations at once, and so voting got erratic. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 17:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wheelwright, Kentucky
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Harry Fain, coal loader. Inland Steel Company, Wheelwright ^1 & 2 Mines, Wheelwright, Floyd County, Kentucky. - NARA - 541452 - cropped and restored.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 13:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Raising a Flag over the Reichstag

Could you have a look at the Alt here? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 14:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Newton Willard Utley

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Newton Willard Utley you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 20:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Newton Willard Utley

The article Newton Willard Utley you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Newton Willard Utley and Talk:Newton Willard Utley/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John White (Kentucky politician)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John White (Kentucky politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ma, Ma, where's my Pa?
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Another voice for Cleveland - F.B. LCCN95522869 - restoration2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 08:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph Bosworth (Kentucky politician)

On 18 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Bosworth (Kentucky politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joseph Bosworth (pictured) was the last Republican speaker of the Kentucky House of Representatives until the election of Jeff Hoover in 2017? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Bosworth (Kentucky politician). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Bosworth (Kentucky politician)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John White (Kentucky politician)

The article John White (Kentucky politician) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:John White (Kentucky politician) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Newton Willard Utley

The article Newton Willard Utley you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Newton Willard Utley for comments about the article, and Talk:Newton Willard Utley/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 21:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ellen Axson Wilson
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Ellen Axson Wilson (4435974396) - cropped and retouched.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 03:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your ANI post

I suggest that you and I agree not to engage in any continuing disputation, but seek to cooperate from now on. – Sca (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, agreed. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 20:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Coal tipple in Kenvir, Kentucky
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Tipple of Mine ^31. Black Mountain Corporation, 30-31 Mines, Kenvir, Harlan County, Kentucky. - NARA - 541267 - cropped (2).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 06:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Kentuckian,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Laura Clay
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Laura Clay by the Gerhard Sisters, 1916.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 07:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kentuckian/Archive_1&oldid=1222180727"