User talk:Kenwood 3000

Welcome

Hello, Kenwood 3000, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 16:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Genesis

Hello. This message is regarding the page Genesis (band). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. AreJay 20:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Brand X

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Timanfaya 11:28, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Hart-Stein

Ian Hart-Stein has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove AfD tags from articles, which are needed to direct people to the discussion. Please contribute to the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Hart-Stein. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to my user page

Do NOT blank my talk page. Doing so is considered vandalism. I'm not allowed to blank my talk page; why are you allowed to blank it?

Also, the All Music Guide has very specific discographies for the Brand X albums I cited. None of them mention Ian Hart-Stein. All of them mention John Goodsall.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:Elkman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. and you can bet I'm going to bring this to an administrator's attention. --E lkman - ^(talk) 20:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked for 24 hours for blatant hoaxing. Believe me, I was very keen to make this indefinite so no-one had to chase your edits around anymore, but I felt I should give you the chance to a) give a reliable source for this 'alternate history' of Brand X you've come up with, or b) choose to contribute productively. You may still edit this talk page (though not to remove warnings or perpetrate other vandalism). --Sam Blanning^(talk) 22:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Is There Anything About? was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 20:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

====Regarding edits made during April 6 2006 (UTC)==== Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

As this account has only been used to introduce false information into Wikipedia articles, it is indefinitely blocked from editing. If this stuff about missing members of Brand X is true, and you have this photographic evidence and contact with the members, then take it to the newspapers or music magazines. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and cannot publish original research of any kind. When the media breaks the story, we can use it as a source.

Not that I believe you have this evidence for a moment. Missing members, fine, but a great conspiracy to cover up the real tracklistings of the albums that actually do exist?

If you feel like contributing productively to Wikipedia, or if you have any other questions, you may still edit this talk page and place the {{unblock}} template if you have a legitimate reason to be unblocked, or email an administrator at Wikipedia:List of administrators. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 20:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's {{unblock}} with two curly brackets each side. When you added it to your page - far more times than was necessary - one of the brackets was a normal paranthesis. I've added a proper tag for you above. Would you mind clarifying exactly why you feel you should be unblocked? Have you decided to stop using Wikipedia to hoax people? It's unlikely any admin will unblock you without a reason. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 21:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a reason for requesting an unblock, please say it. Otherwise, unblock is denied, your account appears to be mostly vandalism -- Tawker 08:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My account should be unblocked as I was acting on www.rockcrypt.com's info - i did NOT create that website - I have been in contact with those involved. I no try to spread ignorance, I act in good faith, I use my expertise more productively now. :~)

as above posting multiple unblock tag does nothing extra. You take responsibility for your own actions here, so sorry no. --pgk^(talk) 17:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]