User talk:Kepin

This is a Wikipedia user talk page, not an encyclopedic article. You can leave me a message here.

Wikimedia Foundation

Unsourced and improper user warnings

Please don't use warning templates that are inaccurate, as you did on User Talk:Kungfuadam. Blanking is defined by wikipedia policy in terms of vandalism as: "Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit.". Removing point of view, as Kungfuadam has done in these edits[1] [2] is not page blanking, nor is it vandalism. If you disagree with such an edit, it is likely an editor dispute. Kevin_b_er 00:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Liberal edits

Please stop editing articles and making unsourced assertions of liberal bias. --ElKevbo 00:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Typos on your user page...

"consitently stand" should go to "consistently stands" (I don't fix it myself because user pages are somewhat special on Wikipedia). No comment on the semantics... Have fun! --Stephan Schulz 05:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Hawking

I second your comment on this personality. --Scotteh 18:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

NEW

YO GUYS I NEED HELP GETTING GOING CAN ANYONE HELP ME

Democratic Party

If you believe the Democratic Party should be described as "socialist" and "left wing", I suggest initiating a discussion at Talk:Democratic Party (United States). I have a strong feeling, however, that other editors will agree with my assessment that describing the Dems only as left wingers is inappropriately POV. · j e r s y k o talk · 13:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Stop Vandalizing pages

Stop vandalizing pages. Lordkazan 20:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Freepsbane 00:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

With all due respect the only edits you have done in recent months have been either blatant POV insertion, or a attempt to insert vandalism undetected[3]. Please stop these actions the only thing they accomplish are provoking other editors into an editwar, instead take part in constructive editing.

Notability (books)

Hi, you were recently involved in a debate where Wikipedia:Notability (books) was cited. This proposal is under development and would benefit from being assessed by more editors. Perhaps you would be interested in expressing an opinion at the project talk page. NB This does not have any bearing on the previous debate in which you were involved. JackyR | Talk 19:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

It seems that your knowledge of climatology is a tad bit outdated. [[4]]

Vandalism

Wow, you're quite the stereotypical american. Do you use a breadbin on a stick as a postbox? Anyway, I reverted someone's Kubrickian musings from your user page. Have fun, cowboy. yandman 21:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Improper page move

Needless to say, this page move is not supported. I asked for some help in moving it back. , but if you're willing to do it, all the better. . Have a good day. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 22:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

George W. Bush

If you continue to blank properly sourced material in this article, you will be blocked from editing. Your edit has been reverted and I ask that you take it to the talk page. - auburnpilot talk 17:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan

I read your comments on the talk page of Ronald Reagan. The article is already semi-protected, so is there anything else we can do? Happyme22 23:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Tobacco smoking rv

I had to undo all your edits to the article. There may well be problems of undue weight - I haven't looked extensively enough to know - but blanking enormous sections on the basis of excluding "nanny state liberal health-0-fascist garbage" is way off base. Keep in mind that WP:NPOV does not mean removing information which might favour a particular POV, but representing controversies fairly in accordance with the apparent size of a POV faction. And it certainly doesn't mean removing information from neutral sources like medical journals and historians because it might have the effect of boosting a viewpoint. Thanks. Eleland 22:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments on this talk page

Kepin, would you please removing or moderating the statements which precede your table of contents on this page? Wikipedia is neither a battleground nor a soapbox, and the inclusion of hostile, insulting, and possibly threatening comments is very uncivil. Specifically, Wikipedia:User page#Inappropriate content notes that "you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense." Thanks. <eleland/talkedits> 22:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Talk:George W. Bush

Comments such as this are not only unnecessary, but are considered trolling as well. Please refrain from doing this. Thanks.--Rise Above The Vile 22:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)