User talk:Kesac/Archive 1

Reformatted talk page

Old comments are available here. Kesac 23:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Sorry for making that, but I felt I had to tag Bunchofgrapes (talk · contribs) because he's been fighting with another user and he is using his admin priviledges to keep that person off and make him suffer. Ranchof32 15:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

If you feel Bunchofgrapes is abusing his admin priviledges, you can bring it up at WP:RFC/ADMIN. Creating attack pages won't help your case however. Kesac 15:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the reverts, Kesac! (EddieSegoura there is banned by the community; he needs to make his case (via off-wiki channels) to either ArbCom or Jimbo Wales.) —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

The so-called ban is not a legitimate one. Bunchofgrapes imposed this on eddie and continues to enforce it. He has no right to decide who can and cannot edit wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by E12.29.2006. (talk • contribs)

Hi I erased any legal threats!! Sorry...didn't read those rules. I do represent Dr Rey and was disappointed to see someone just lie about him on his biography like that (we've had problems with people harassing him, extortion etc..., so I am vigilant about defamation). Anyhow, I'll just deal with the editor on talk pages etc... without any legal threats. Thank you!

Confused...

Why was my page put on the delete thing... I'm not clear on what it is anyway... If you could just remove the whole page... Because it is about "Me"... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Notredame123 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC). Notredame123 21:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Adam Gipson

I'm almost positive this article is a hoax, shall I Afd it? RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 19:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I've tagged it with {{prod}}, it looks pretty clear that it's a hoax. Kesac 19:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah good work, I'll prod2 it now RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 19:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hat tip

Thanks for the userpage revert. A Train ^{take the} 23:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		keep beating me to it! good job :) guiltyspark 23:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage! RedRollerskate 14:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice Job

We seem to be running into each other a lot on the patrols - lets keep up the good work! .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.^{( talk | contrib)} 17:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I was just about to try reverting the Sept. 11 page. But you beat me to it! What a jackass, eh? (Varlaam 02:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC))

Thanks

WikiThanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. No idea what that was about... —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, too

What he said! You're a good guy to take the time and trouble. --Tenebrae 17:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Chuck Norris and the battle of Thermopylae

Why are you afraid of the truth? The truth that 10 spartan ninjas lead by Chuck Norris defeated a persian army of eleventy-billion-gazillion-frufrillion people? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Asfdgds (talk • contribs) 04:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC).

Er, yeah. If you can find a reliable source for that, then you can add it. Seriously though, the edit was vandalism. Please stop. :PKesac 04:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for vandalizing Juicy Fruit

Note: Template: uw-bv added by Funnylingus (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) removed

Er, yeah. [1] Kesac 16:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Ukraine

Hi. Considerng every Ukrainian I've ever known (including family who were born there) has referred to the country as "The Ukraine," I really feel it is incorrect to include the word "incorrect" in the alternate name statement on that page. So, with all due respect, I'm changing it back. Hoshq 22:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The problem is, your edit deleted a good portion of the page as well. Please check this diff: [2]. It was probably accidential -- your browser probably cut off the text in the edit box. I've readded the change you made in the first paragraph. You may want to read Wikipedia:Article size for more information about the problem. Thanks! Kesac 22:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

はいはいまた始まりましたよー!!!近所のご主人が!!!近所の奥さん追っかけまわしておちょくってるだけで!!!おもしろい!!?あぁー!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 薫田権之助 (talk • contribs)

Babelfish translation: It was and now it is started -! ! ! Master of neighborhood! ! ! Lady of neighborhood you chase and turn and fall with just the ょ くっ て る! ! ! It is funny! ! ? あ ぁ -! ! ! Kesac 22:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

thanks!

Thank you for your swift response to the vandalism on my talk page. I have no doubt this user is an abusive sock of User:Wrestlinglover420. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 01:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hotmofo sock

Hi there, Thanks for the revert on my userpage. I'm pretty sure User:Hotmofo vandalised my page as User:Sett46 last week, and he claims in his vandalism on my page that he is User:Rusty shackelford. There are about 10 similar usernames to that, none of which seem to be blocked, although User:Rusty Shacklefrod, User:Rustyshackleforded have warnings. User:RustyShackleford seems to be unrelated. I'll keep my eyes open for this guy. Later, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 03:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, he was hitting my userpage pretty hard as well, claimed he had been "blocked 30 times". Kesac 03:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Whats so wrong

About my template? its perfectly fine.Zora72 03:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

It's not appropriate for Wikipedia. When would the template be used? How would it improve the article? If you think an article is good, you could nominate it for Good Article status. I tagged it as nonsense because of the all caps, and the wording of the template (THIS ARTICLE IS TOO GOOD FOR YOU TO MESS UP.) would draw vandals like moths to a flame. Side note: the image in the template does not have any license information. Kesac 04:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

ok.

BUT BEFORE YOU DO ANYTHING LET ME JUST SAY THE UNCYCLOPEDIA FUCKING SUCKS. (p.s. CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL) Zora72 19:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Winzip

Go to winzip now and answer the question I asked you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vigax (talk • contribs) 01:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC).

i was only pointing out the facts here

Edward 1 did die at 66 and on the 6 july 1307 to what ur letting people believe is false sorry for stating facts facts that r true maby i sould stop comming to this site after all it might all be a load of lies —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Solonggoodfaith (talk • contribs) 12:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

[3] This is the edit I reverted. Kesac 22:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Acorn98

I wasn't Vadalizing the UFC page, I went there and someone had changed it.. I didn't Know how to revert the page so I had just typed that so someone could go and fix it. So can you please remove the warning from my talk page?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Acorn98 (talk • contribs)

You removed all of the content from the page and replaced it. (see [4]) Kesac 23:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Allodoxaphobia

Thank you for bringing that to my attention, the last editor didn't link me to the existing debate, so i was confused as to why there was so much strife in deleting it rapidly.--Conrad Kilroy 15:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal Attacks???

Hello, I'm the maker of the page Crink, and I feel that your speedy deletion is an unjust charge. First off, there's no way you read in like .2 seconds, so you obviously tagged it with a random charge. Maybe if you took the time to read the article on Crink you would see that it is an educational source.I am just trying to educate the people about Crink. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crink69 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC).

I am the maker of the article on Crink, and I feel that you have deleted my uplifting article on Crink for no apparent Reason. The word Crink is not a personal attack because it is not based on any person. If you were to walk around just about any suburban town,you will hear the word Crink being used excessively, thus it is a real word. I do believe that wikipedia has an article on the vulgar word Fuck, why should I not be able to spread the word about Crink? I am begging you do not delete the word Crink —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crink69 (talk • contribs)

The article seemed to be talking about a person. Note that it could have been deleted under A1,G1,or G4 as well, as that was the 8th time that article was posted and deleted. Kesac 21:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page! ... discospinster _talk 12:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Your warning

Any block won't stick because of who I'm reverting. If you take a look at the last revert by User:Palffy, you'll know why. Kingjeff 00:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that -- it looked like a content dispute to me (with OtherBeing using socks) That's why I placed the note on both userpages. Never mind, ignore the warning. Kesac 00:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome. Welcome to Wikipedia to you, too (even though you must have been writing for a while)

I noticed that you only said welcome to me. Are you assigned to welcome only new members with a 5 letter name, like yourself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spevw (talk • contribs)

It's more I saw you creating your userpage on Recent changes, and decided to pop a welcome on your userpage. Kesac 02:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Chuck Norris (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought I saw something else, so I reverted your revert of MartinBot, I've seen my mistake and re-reverted to your revision. Sorry again. KOS | talk 02:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, was a false positive, I think MartinBot saw the link that was removed in the edit after the vandalism, and thought it was vandalism. Kesac 02:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Weird Editing Problem And The Weird Tags

Yeah those were the tags I was looking for, but that wasn't the only problem. For some reason when I clicked the edit button to the right of the topic, it was telling me the topic didn't exist so I kept having to just click "edit this page" and scrolling down to repeat my mistakes. Not sure why that happened. -WarthogDemon 04:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Yone Minagawa fanatic

Greetings,

Someone keeps vandalizing the Oldest people and associated articles, in particular saying negative things about Yone Minagawa. Could you protect these and associated pages (listed at the bottom) from 'newly-registered users'?Ryoung122 22:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

zone control

i believe i did say that zone control was "an increasingly popular playable starcraft game"

deleting it is like deleting the starcraft page. Specialfill08 22:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Source? Kesac 22:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Unsigned comment

peregrine here

hey am not done with the page yet so plzz dont delete it ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peregrine08 (talk • contribs)

If you need some time to make an article, you can make it as a subpage of your userpage, and move it into main space when you're finished. However, you may want to read WP:OR as well -- personal essays will usually be deleted. Kesac 01:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Meganium etc

I've submitted a checkuser IP check request for Meganium, Bayleef and Chikorita, I'll add this latest one you've found if you can tell me what makes you suspect it? So I can add the reason to the request. Liverpool Scouse 23:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Check the linked edit. I'm in the process of making a SSP page for Meganium as well. Kesac 23:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Ahh, seen it now. I'll keep an eye out for Meganium's SSP page, feel free to remove Chikorita's one,and/or merge the content into Meganium's or whatever. Probably easier to have it all in the one place under the actual sockpuppeter. Liverpool Scouse 23:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello Kesac

Thank you for your remark. I respect your doubts of a conflict of interest. That is true if I had described my father in any way other than stating facts. I did not say he was the best in the world, nor did I say he was clever or a genius. I simply stated facts and dates.

I am a professional Media Expert, journalist, and a producer, and I have produced several documentaries and programs that circulated round the world. I am well known in my region, and I believe that I should always be honest in what I report.

Please check my web page [5] It has a lot of evidence and documents proving what I have stated.

I have edited a peace of information in a different article that I did not write, yet no one disputed my edit. I have researched it very well before implementing it, as I have researched my father's Career.

I did not even write about him as a person so as not to create a conflict. I decided to write about him because he had an important role in the formation of the UAE, and was one of very few men in the world that wrote the constitution of a newborn country during the last century.

He died in 1973 no one wrote about him in this excellent platform of knowledge and information. If I did not write about him, who would?

P.S. If any further proof is required I am ready to submit it. I know this is a good point of discussion, but please advice me what to do to take away the remark of the possible conflict of interest because it sheds doubt on the information provided.

I am a new user of wikipedia though I have been using it for as long as it has started.

---

--mnb 15:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mnbitar (talk • contribs) 15:14, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Shining Force

I noticed that you applied the tag on Shining Force saying that the plot summary was too long. I recently reduced the size of it. I'm actually concerned that I cut too much from it, as I've never played the game and thus had to use the existing summary as a guide. Do you think the issues in the tag have been addressed? Larrythefunkyferret 07:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Ben 10

Do you like Ben 10. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vigax (talk • contribs) 01:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Wombatcat

Thanks for the revert - you get a wikicookie!

response

Shhhhh...........

user space

Recalling my past experiances with gnanpatiti, you like to undo other peoples edits without discussing it first on the talk page for that article, then when your changes are undone, you complain that it wasn't discussed first on the article talk page. Also you mentioned that all images should be removed, I am allowed to have a couple or maybe a bit more. If you remove them all from my talk page then it would be unfair as other users have this material on their talk page. I have removed heaps, even some of the userboxes like recent changes patrol and new page patrol and some of the misc australian userboxes as well. I think that this may have something to do with my reverts to Tourism in India which is now at its best, even though its still crap. This is after it was cleaned up by Lara Bran and my good self. Three of four more articles have come out of that one article. So as for gnanpati this is you chance for some payback. MI-5 शान्ति शान्ति এই সভ্যজন অসমৰ

Thanks for helping

Just wanted to say thanks for your efforts in helping with the vandalism on the 4Runner page. Not sure why people keep changing the external link I created vs adding their own. I added the link as it is a good source of info for the newest 4Runners.

Andries

25 July 1AM

Smile

Connell66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.

You wrote the above. I discussed it on my page. Please stop worrying about it. I promise you that I don't hate cats! Member of the North Atlantic Society of Dog Lovers 22:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see my response on your user talk. Kesac 22:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

You deleted Bushcaddy--why? Why didn't you tage it first? It's not my company nor do I have any financial interest in it. The article may not have been perfect, but it wasn't a sales ad and any problem it had could have been fixed easily. Instead, you took it upon yourself to delete it. Do you even know anything about kitplanes, or were you just being a self-idulgent new article cop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crwesq@gmail.com (talk • contribs) 19:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Bushcaddy

you inapprpriately deleted Bushcaddy and then said you did it for reasons stated when you originally deleted it. Those reasons, if you had read my response to deletion, where unfair and not purusant to Wiki policy. Care to respond intelligently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crwesq@gmail.com (talk • contribs) 19:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

About Article Pi Story

The Main Pi story Website jp/Kr as stated in the terms of use allows use of the Public use of its game summaries and images as long as it is not for Profitable use also —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marth555pete (talk • contribs) 03:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Replied on your talk. Kesac 03:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm new, okay?

Soad liker 01:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)I'm the guy you gave that little "don't remove speedy deletion" comment. I'm still learning a few things here.....

That's why I gave you the notice not to remove the speedy tags -- it's more an FYI thing. Didn't want to see you blocked for removing them over and over. Kesac 01:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Country Varmint Hunter

An article that you have been involved in editing, Country Varmint Hunter, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken hunter wanted. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 03:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Ashatnga

Changed your stub categorization for Ashtanga. It relates to Yoga, not martial arts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.109.63 (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yeah, that's probably a better one. Kesac 00:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

List of Jewish astronauts - To be "speedily deleted"- WHY?????

I created a page of "a list of Jewsish astronauts", and as soon as I pressed "save page", I received a notice saying "this page will be speedily deleted", because "it is too short" and "ït contains no useful information" or words to that effect. This is not so and I appeal to you NOT to delete it. It is useful information, like the lists of Jewish sportsmen etc., albeit smaller. Mind you, it's bigger than the list of Israeli astronauts - a total of one. It will be nice to see this page left in place. This is my first attempt at creating a list. I know it is not technically set up quite correctly (I will try to improve it), but as I said, it is my FIRST attempt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin marks (talk • contribs) 22:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

When you created the page, all you had was category links, no text at all. This falls under the speedy deletion criteria, A3. If you need time to work on the article, you can create the article in your userspace, for example at User:Colin marks/List of Jewish astronauts, and move it to the mainspace when it's ready. Kesac 22:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

miletich fighting systems

I am writing to ask that the miletich fighting systems page be locked indefinately because of a man posting on the site. He has been attempting to copyright and trademark material using my name and these activities are not acceptable or acknowledged by my company. Any Miletich Fighting systems minnesota material is not acceptable on the miletich fighting systems page.

Thank you, Pat Miletich

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.22.199.233 (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

why?

why did you call for the deletion of the article i posted? what difference does it make whether or not it exists? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainChaos199 (talk • contribs)

• It was a non-notable web comic. Kesac 01:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

BioMAJ

Hi Kesac,

I'm wikibm- the user who created the BioMAJ page. I put up this article is not for advertising BioMAJ. This is a research product from INRIA, the French National Research Inst of Informatics. We have been receiving a lot of questions about this from a lot of researchers all over the world. That's why I created this article to explain a little bit about BioMAJ which is an OPEN_SOURCE project.

Hope that you won't delete it this time.

Regards, wikibm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikibm (talk • contribs) 12:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

How.....?

Please explain how you A - saw my message to anon IP to which you appear to have no connection and B - Saw fit to blank it.

A implies you are wikistalking me and B is just plain out of line. The message wasn't for you, you had no right to blank it. Exxolon 18:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edit summary "Go away" threw up a red flag. Kesac 18:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

As a side note, you may want to read WP:CIVIL, some of your recent comments have been very incivil. The message I blanked was a personal attack. Kesac 18:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

userpage revert

thank you a lot for reverting vandalism on my user page. cheers! West Brom 4ever 22:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

you know instead of delete my page you should get rid of the more filthy ones out there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tls321 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

My talk page

Thank you for continuing to revert vandalism on my talk page. This is a long-term vandal with a lot of sleepers though, so it might go on for a while. east.718 at 02:28, 11/12/2007

• No problem, hopefully he'll be running out of sleepers soon. Kesac 02:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

What do I gotta' do to make you want me baby?

How could you? I'll have you know that a lot of people want to know about me, you are being totally unfair!!!

Yours Sincerely Lee 'Sexy' Ambrose  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fellowger (talk • contribs) 00:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 

Dynasty Warriors images

Ah, thanks. Long time browser but new contributor. So they gotta be low res huh? Ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Satsu Ryu (talk • contribs) 00:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

About the image reduction request template

How do I remove those or do those go away on their own because I have since then complied with said reduction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Satsu Ryu (talk • contribs) 00:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Your Userboxes

Hi,

Can I have the code to have the first, second and fourth of your user boxes as I like doing the same thing as you, RC Patrol.

The Helpful One (Talk) 17:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Ralph Nader

Hey Kesac, I am sorry about the Nader article. But it's sort of a matter of principle at this point. This article is being hounded by sock puppets. Astruc (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great job cleaning up Grawp! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Glass insualtor page deleted

User-friendliness at this site leaves a lot to be desired.

The pics I posted concerning the glass insulators page I submitted were, for the most part, my own pics I took of my own insulators, specifically for releasing them so anyone, anywhere could use them for anything.

I tried to simply state this when I submitted them but found the system in use to submit greatly lacking in simplicity of use. Due to a busy schedule, and lack of time to delve through pages and pages of insturctions, I THOUGHT that signing these pics as being avaliable for use by anyone, for anything, taken by myself, of my own pieces, would make it very clear they were not copyrighted. Obviously, a simple check box making a statement to this effect would be a great help. Instead, for some of the pics I ddi upload, the checkboxes (tags - whatever) limited me to notbeing able to satisfactorily label them as to what they actually were. I was given full permission by my friend to use these pictyures in any way I saw fit for educational purposes - including postibng them to the Wikipedia page I was submitting. There was not a suimple way opf stating this as the tag options are pre-defined without an option to change what they say. The instructions I rememebr reading made it sound as if one of the boxes (options) of the tags needed to be chosen for the pic to be used. I was not sure why there was a box where I typed the pics were my own, of my own pieces, etc. since it seemed a tag had to be used and, truthfully, I did not have the time - nor do I now - to wade through the lengthy pages of information you make people wade through in order to contribute. Even getting to this link to leave this message was a 3 click/link/path instead of simply putting a "Reply" link into the original message that told me the pics were deleted.

Even if the pics in the article were not appropriate - which may have been the case (???) as I was not 100% certain of whether or not my message included with them was all that was needed, certainly the historical data I supplied with the pics was something which, since it was original and therefore not under any copyright, is applicable to the subject of insulators in general. The historical value these man-made devices served has been greatly unnoticed and therefore, what better place to include it than in the Wikipedia? The modern twist the outdated glass devices have taken is certainly worth recording since it is something which is noticed worldwide by thousands of people.

As to being relevant to the insulator category - where else would it go?

I did a search, just to see what other sort of things were in the Wikipedia. I deliberately did a search for things which the general public considers to be vulgar. Surely if an entire page is given to cusswords such as F***, is not the historical role the insulator held worthy of recognition?

BTW - I have no idea what the url was to the page I submitted. I have too busy of a schedule to have tried to wade through all of this. It was nmuch simpler to do a search for "Glass insulator" on the home page. Now there is no mention of it when i do a search for "glass insulator," and the page for "insulator" has totally deleted everything concerning the historical aspects of insulators (and some of this was info which IO contributed a couple of years ago and has been included on this site since then - why is this info, now, all of a sudden, something that is no longer important?"

BTW - here is a user friendly way of replying to me: lbrewer42@embarqmail.com

copy and paste this in an email program

seri9ously, you really need to get someone from outside of the system, who is familiar with teaching/making complex systems easy to understand (this leaves out a Microsoft employee), to make the Wikipedia easier to sumit articles to. Pages and pages of instructions; 3 links when one is possible; already formatted options (vs - here is a list of single options, check those which apply); etc. will help people be mo0re apt to want to cotribute and then we all win. The lifestyles people lead today do not allow for a manual just to offer information. I know this incident has greatly discouraged me in wanting to submit anything (especially since all reference was deleted - even from the past 2 years!).

Thanks, Lee

re:crack dagger

The crack dagger is not vandalism. I have remade it to fit the guidelines, and it was removed again. Please do not threaten.

Bobby Petrino

Take it to the talk page and provide your source that "it's official". They haven't even had the news conference yet, which will take place in 1 hour. Until an official source says he's officially hired, it doesn't go in the article as it's not fact. -- ALLSTARecho 04:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm watching the news conference right now. Kesac (talk) 04:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Warnings

Just a notice that registered users are allowed to blank there pages whenever they want except for sockpuppetry notices on there user page Alexfusco5 00:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I restored it only due to the uw-vand4 I was going to place there. Kesac (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

(specifically, due to the RFA vandalism by the user.) Kesac (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Barbara Connor-Reed

I could add images of her work and it could be compared to the unique style of work developing here in the Pacific Northwest. I have listed other accomplished Northwest artists.--SD Denmark (talk) 02:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for the great anti-vandalism work you did very early this morning against the New Year's avalanche. Kakofonous (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

o.O You're a very profilic vandal fighter, is there some reason you don't have administrative rollback rights? east.718 at 16:57, January 17, 2008

Just haven't bothered making the request yet. Will do right now. Kesac (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Article

Your recently made The National Football League in Toronto a candidate for deletion because of crystal balling. I recently added sources that verify that there has been speculation of an NFL franchise in Toronto. Hopefully we can resolve this issue without deleting the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joesixpac (talk • contribs) 23:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism on Beggar Prince

Hi. An anonymous user who keeps changing IP address has done the same edit four times on Beggar Prince. The edits, which simply removes two paragraphes which could be seen as negative about the game, are as far as I know true (but they have no sources). A third opinion or other action by you would be greatly appreciated. Zebbe (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

While the anon really should be leaving an edit summary, I don't think it's vandalism. Those sentences really do need a source. I've tagged the article with {{nofootnotes}} and {{cleanup-link rot}}, and tagged the two statements in question with {{fact}}. Kesac (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Eco 3

I put it up for AfD, since Lil Nims won't stop deleting the speedy...even if he removes the header on the AfD, it still goes on :) LegoTech·(t)·(c) 03:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

True, but reporting to AIV works as well when you have someone who just won't stop removing speedies. Kesac (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Yup, you got him :) LegoTech·(t)·(c) 12:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

ok thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by SonicFan555 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Imprivata page - speedy delete?

Hello,

I am trying to create a page for our client & think I messed up pretty badly by trying to change the page 'single sign on' a few weeks ago. I was uneducated about the wiki-system with attempted changes & would like to move forward & use wikipedia far more for many of our social marketing activities. Can you please let me know how to undo this restriction? Thank you for your time, Bill Imprivata (talk) 02:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. Kesac (talk) 02:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Weird revision history of Topa The Hill

You warned the creator of that page about the db tag. Did you add that tag? From the article history [6] it looks like he added the db tag himself when creating the page. Can you clear this up for me? --Thinboy00 @773, i.e. 17:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism on my userpage

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage :) Asendoh (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tradio

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tradio, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tradio. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD fix

This was my first time nominating an article for deletion. What step did I miss? Thanks Groupsisxty (talk) 15:06, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Can you block User:FMBlogger?

I'm not sure if you're an admin. But this user's account needs to be blocked. Thanks. --RoomDownUnitStage (talk) 00:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Self-redirect on DVJ1000

Oops... I was actually trying to redirect the article to DVJ-1000 instead of the article itself. Thanks for pointing this out. I believe it is now ok. DiscoNova (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for fixing the vandal redirect on my talk page, I could not figure out how to do it myself. Annelies.r (talk) 00:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Changes to Shepherd

Was actually trying to undo vandalism that was already on the page, as opposed to testing changes. Only discovered the undo after changing it. By which time the changes didn't want to be undone... Koppnenaal (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Cool, noted. Koppnenaal (talk) 02:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Danny Granger

Oops, I guess I was going to fast and got my fingers tangled up somehow. The one I was after was the "sexxxxxxxxxxx." Thanks for the heads up. Cmichael (talk) 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for the confusion. My brother logged on as me and made a page (Charlie Lavallee now deleted)and someone else (Tim Lavallee also deleted). I didn't realize this and so i am very sorry on his behalf. Animllover11 (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)