User talk:Keskkonnakaitse
|
|
Your GA nomination of Connor Maloney[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Connor Maloney you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Connor Maloney[edit]
The article Connor Maloney you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Connor Maloney for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Luis Argudo[edit]
Hello:
The copy edit you requested fom the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Luis Argudo has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. The article was actually in good shape, and I really made only small changes to it.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Twofingered Typist:, thanks for the review, glad to be able to get Argudo up to quality before I take the article to GAN!! 21.colinthompson (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Connor Maloney[edit]
The article Connor Maloney you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Connor Maloney for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Harrison Afful[edit]
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Harrison Afful has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conor Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberliga Südwest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Niko Hansen[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Niko Hansen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Helping on the Category:Unassessed football articles[edit]
You know as the only person that is doing this, I will ask if you need help on trying to get this down at a quicker rate by aiding you in using my alternate account (this one is mainly for main edits and talk while the other one is for categories and re-ratings) Not Homura (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- I will properly do the same and go from the first page onwards. Not Homura (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Just adding it here but their is a lot of lists havn't been rated in the category (third page after you click on L). Matt294069 (talk) 01:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Niko Hansen[edit]
The article Niko Hansen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Niko Hansen for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Niko Hansen[edit]
The article Niko Hansen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Niko Hansen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
I created something[edit]
Something I'm doing for fun. Please check it out! User:Freefalling660/For Fun. Freefalling660 (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edward Opoku[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edward Opoku you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edward Opoku[edit]
The article Edward Opoku you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Edward Opoku for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Edward Opoku[edit]
The article Edward Opoku you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edward Opoku for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Luis Argudo[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Luis Argudo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Luis Argudo[edit]
The article Luis Argudo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Luis Argudo for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Luis Argudo[edit]
The article Luis Argudo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Luis Argudo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
span formatting[edit]
Is there a reason you removed the quotes from the spans in this edit? 01:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Two reasons: (1) it's cleaner visually when using the editor, and saves bytes on the overall page size, (2) the table appears to be the same without the quotes as it does with them, I assumed that the quotes were a deprecated item that were left over from the earlier days of Wikipedia (kind of reminiscent of tables that looked like this. 21.colinthompson (talk) 02:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's incorrect though according to W3C guidelines. Most modern browsers deal with them correctly, but we shouldn't force them to. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC records and results, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Patrick Mullins[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patrick Mullins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Patrick Mullins[edit]
The article Patrick Mullins you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Patrick Mullins for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Patrick Mullins[edit]
The article Patrick Mullins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Patrick Mullins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jon Kempin[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jon Kempin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jon Kempin[edit]
The article Jon Kempin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jon Kempin for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jon Kempin[edit]
The article Jon Kempin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jon Kempin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harrison Afful[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harrison Afful you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammar Elbehery -- Ammar Elbehery (talk) 23:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harrison Afful[edit]
The article Harrison Afful you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Harrison Afful for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammar Elbehery -- Ammar Elbehery (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harrison Afful[edit]
The article Harrison Afful you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harrison Afful for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammar Elbehery -- Ammar Elbehery (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
List of Canada women's international soccer players[edit]
Hi. Thanks for expanding List of Canada women's international soccer players, I was about to do that today after I expanded their head to head records yesterday! Are you thinking of completing the rest? I have a couple other projects I'm doing, but if not I will find the time. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Vaselineeeeeeee: Yeah, it might take me a day or two but I plan on finishing out the list! I might also spin off a separate article for players with 1–9 caps, there's about as many of them as there are players with 10 or more. 21.colinthompson (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Regarding 1–9 caps in a separate article, I know the England national team does that, but I've had a recent discussion with a user when we were cleaning up the Italy player list, and decided that splitting the article into number of caps would make it more difficult for the editor to update caps, and the reader to find various players, so we left it in one article. Especially with the Canada women's, there isn't an overwhelming number of players, so I think that working on it in your sandbox as you find time is good, but I don't think we need a second article here. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019[edit]
|
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019 |
 Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019
Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going. WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST! Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126 Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}. These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions!
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
 Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thanks so much for all the work you have put into the Crew page, and for keeping up my Player Records section! I created it a few years back and quickly fell behind on it, so I'm glad to see somebody has kept it going. Do you have a spreadsheet you're using for it? I know the assists can be more of a pain to track especially with players who have played for a while with the Crew like Waylon.
Again, thanks for all you have been doing for the Crew and for Cleveland SC too! Rhysapgruffydd (talk) 14:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kirk Urso you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Kirk Urso you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kirk Urso for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Kirk Urso you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kirk Urso for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keskkonnakaitse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hackerthebest1023". The reason given for Hackerthebest1023's block is: "Disruptive editing".
Your GA nomination of Mike Avery[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mike Avery you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Mike Avery GA review[edit]
I've completed the GA review on Mike Avery. Since you have limited access to Wifi, I'm keeping this on review until I hear from you in the review. I've also pinged you there as well. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your GA nomination of Mike Avery[edit]
The article Mike Avery you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mike Avery for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Álvaro Betancourt[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Álvaro Betancourt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Álvaro Betancourt[edit]
The article Álvaro Betancourt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Álvaro Betancourt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Conner Cappelletti[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Conner Cappelletti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Conner Cappelletti[edit]
The article Conner Cappelletti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Conner Cappelletti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Álvaro Betancourt[edit]
The article Álvaro Betancourt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Álvaro Betancourt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Conner Cappelletti[edit]
The article Conner Cappelletti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Conner Cappelletti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martín Vásquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major Indoor Soccer League. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Josh Lundstram[edit]
Hello, Keskkonnakaitse. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Josh Lundstram, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Luke Giverin for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke Giverin, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Giverin (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]
Hello Keskkonnakaitse:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Your GA nomination of McKenzie Berryhill[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article McKenzie Berryhill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of McKenzie Berryhill[edit]
The article McKenzie Berryhill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:McKenzie Berryhill for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of McKenzie Berryhill[edit]
The article McKenzie Berryhill you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:McKenzie Berryhill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Georgia Storm FC[edit]
Hi, Keskkonnakaitse, I found you from your edit on Hunter Jumper and saw you focus on an NPSL team. I have been fighting and clawing to first get Georgia Storm FC approved which I finally got only for it to be tagged for potential deletion today. I thought you might be able to give some advice or guidance to keep the article approved. Every reviewer tags the player notability guidelines but ignores the club notability guidelines. Georgia Storm participated in a US Open Cup which meets club notability. Any thoughts or help would be great. Kevinw33 (talk) 13:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Kevinw33 I took a look through the article and cleaned a bunch of stuff up, and most notably removed the notability tag at the top. There's still some stuff that could be messed with, but at the least there shouldn't be any problems with deletion (and if there are, I'll be right back around to defend this article!) I hope you stick around and keep this article going, it's already one of the better ones in the NPSL. (Also, I looked at the Storm Chasers Instagram...I'm assuming that's y'all creating the page!? From the 6th City Syndicate down to Georgia, good luck into the future, at last unless we ever meet in the playoffs!) Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 20:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keskkonnakaitse Thanks a ton for the help! Yes, I started the Storm Chasers for our first season this past spring\summer. It has been quite the challenge to get everything rolling down here in rural Georgia but it has been a blast. Kevinw33 (talk) 12:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A goat for you![edit]
Thanks for your recent thoughtful additions to AfD discussions I created! I really appreciate you not taking it personally that I've maybe nominated a few things that you have a connection with.
At least the record of your shutout at the Invaders Soccer Complex lives on in our hearts.
MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Steve Palacios[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Steve Palacios you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Since you've probably stopped checking the review page, and weren't pinged when the review was finally posted on April 10, I thought I'd let you know that you can now begin to address the issues the reviewer raised. Thank you for your patience! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Steve Palacios[edit]
The article Steve Palacios you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Steve Palacios for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 06:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| For taking Steve Palacios from being listed for deletion to good article status. — The Most Comfortable Chair 17:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC) |
DYK for Steve Palacios[edit]
On 28 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Steve Palacios, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after his soccer career, Steve Palacios enlisted in the United States Army and played for the United States Armed Forces soccer team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Steve Palacios. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Steve Palacios), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Kwan Baptiste for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kwan Baptiste, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwan Baptiste until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)