User talk:Kevan Dickin

License tagging for File:Rescobie Loch OS Opendata Map.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rescobie Loch OS Opendata Map.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Montrose Air Station Heritage Centre[edit]

Some nice work on the Montrose Air Station Heritage Centre I have tidied it up and made it more like the usual style for wikipedia. I have removed most of the history as most of it doesnt relate to the Museum but the airfield which already has an article at RAF Montrose. Some of the content I removed I will help you put it into the RAF Montrose article when I have time. You need to remember that the article shouldnt be a promotion website for the museum but an encyclopedia entry. That said you did a good job but if you have any questions or need help then please ask on my talk page. MilborneOne (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for assisting with the article. Whilst I understand the rational behind removing the historical text and photographs but I have found it some-what frustrating. The Heritage Centre was formed to promote the history of the Air Station and I was trying to assist that. It was a bit of a balancing act trying to keep it factual and not a vehicle for publicising the Heritage Centre. I may have failed a bit in that...... Are you ok with me putting the historical information and photos you removed into the RAF Montrose article ? I could look at doing that in the near future. Standards have to be maintained on Wikipedia and I'm sure you have fun trying to achieve that. It would have been nice to just have one article covering the whole of the Air Stations history, both RFC and RAF. I understand that you want the existing article RAF Montrose to cover the history and I will work with that. I've learned a lot doing the article and look forward to learning more. Regards Kevan Dickin (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the historic information being in the RAF Montrose article, just to understand although the article is named RAF Montrose it does cover the RFC period as well we just have to pick the most common name. MilborneOne (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's great- thank you for your help Kevan Dickin (talk) 16:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of museums in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Montrose

RAF Montrose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Westland Whirlwind

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kevan Dickin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kevan Dickin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]