User talk:Kevin12345678911111111

Welcome!

Hello, Kevin12345678911111111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Unanything Wiki, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Unanything Wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Unanything Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unanything wiki

Hi. I've deleted this article because it did not contain a credible, sourced assertion of notability. Your comment on the talk page suggested you were planning on rewriting the article, with the possibility that the rewritten version might contain sources and an assertion of notability. If so can I suggest you rewrite it somewhere like sandbox and then move it across to mainspace? Otherwise, if you recreate it as is and then start working on it, you risk having it deleted another time. Euryalus (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steal This Film 2

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Steal This Film 2, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFabgsHFfTw.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steal This Film 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steal This Film 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steal This Film 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 17:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Window has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Window was changed by Kevin12345678911111111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955304 on 2014-07-11T17:06:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Window with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Template:Fast-food chains of the United States. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Nthep (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chick-fil-A, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chick-fil-A was changed by Kevin12345678911111111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862593 on 2014-07-12T21:38:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]