User talk:Kevin W./Archives/2013/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
November 16, 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at State Farm Territorial Cup Series. Unless you have an article that post-dates the Arizona Republic article, dated June 14, 2013, stating that ASU's claim was invalidated, the dispute was settle, or the newspaper of record retracts its support of ASU's claim of a series tie, your edits are not valid. Furthermore, your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.--JavierPHX2013 (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the State Press article does not refute ASU's claim regarding the dispute nor is the State Press a newspaper of record. In this case, the newspaper, either the Arizona Republic or another nationally recognized newspaper of record must be used as a source. As of now, the dispute is on-going.--JavierPHX2013 (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Excuse me? Arizona State's school newspaper admitted that Arizona won the Series. The trophy is still in Tucson. The article very clearly sets out why Arizona won. I don't know what else you need. --Kevin W. - Talk 22:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Again, a newspaper of record would need to invalidate the Arizona Republic article or the Arizona Republic would need to publish a report that the dispute was settled or ASU's claim has been invalidated. Neither of which have occurred. I noticed you are a loyal fan of Arizona and declare so on your user page and I suspect bias is in play. The Arizona State newspaper does not admit that ASU's claim is invalid or that the dispute has been settled.--JavierPHX2013 (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have no desire to start an edit war with you so I'm just going to let it go since you won't listen to reason, but tell me this: how do you explain ASU making no attempt to have the trophy itself taken from Arizona? That sounds a hell of a lot to me like they're admitting defeat. --Kevin W. - Talk 02:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Again, a newspaper of record would need to invalidate the Arizona Republic article or the Arizona Republic would need to publish a report that the dispute was settled or ASU's claim has been invalidated. Neither of which have occurred. I noticed you are a loyal fan of Arizona and declare so on your user page and I suspect bias is in play. The Arizona State newspaper does not admit that ASU's claim is invalid or that the dispute has been settled.--JavierPHX2013 (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Excuse me? Arizona State's school newspaper admitted that Arizona won the Series. The trophy is still in Tucson. The article very clearly sets out why Arizona won. I don't know what else you need. --Kevin W. - Talk 22:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)