Welcome!

Hello, Keyblade Mage/User talk:Keyblade Mage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

bibliomaniac15 22:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism[edit]

Thank you for removing the vandalism to the Goofy article. However, the way to revert vandalism is not by copying & pasting the most recent unvandalized edit of the article, but going to that last edit of the article (under "history") before it was vandalized, then clicking "edit" and then "save page." Thank you! --Lyght 00:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mallory[edit]

May as well take out the bible if your gonna give that argument against harry potter. Wicca, my portkey.... --Gen. S.T. Shrink *^{Get to the bunker}* 01:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? Keyblade Mage 23:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

Well, it was nothing against you, I assure you. Simply an agreement about her claims to the books Wicca mongering. Did I offend? If so, I am certainly sorry --Gen. S.T. Shrink *^{Get to the bunker}* 00:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OH! You mean what I put on my page! No, no, you didn't offend me, I just didn't know that's what you were talking about. Sorry, I thought I was the one who might've made an edit that offended you, and I didn't know what it was about. Keyblade Mage 00:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

Wow. I'm stupid. Keyblade Mage (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

Kuzon[edit]

Sorry, I just assumed someone would have added that information by now after the scene was shown at ytv. Modem 04:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see it, sorry. I watched the episoide on Nickolodian. I didn't think the addition was formed on proof. My bad. Keyblade Mage 04:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Keyblade Mage[reply]

S'allright. Might as well just wait for the episode to air, and then add it. Modem 04:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos[edit]

...Meaning congrats (not that manky little snack) on admitting when you've been a little rotten. That took some stones, and I am glad you used 'em. Have a good weekend. :) -Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 03:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah....thanks, and same to you. Keyblade Mage 14:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

The Aang Article Needs You...[edit]

...To please vote to support it at Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive. I would really appreciate it if you voted as the article needs four votes a week to stay on the list. I would appreciate it greatly. If you complete this task for me, here is a smile to brighten your day:

Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 00:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning[edit]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I would not report a new user for 3RR violations, but considering how you reverted Aang, Katara, and Zuko five times each and have thus far disregarded any chance of discussing the matter on talk pages, I had no choice. Please see WP:AN/3RR. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, "good sir" I only did that thirce- the rest of the times were done manually, not with the handy-dandy little "undo" button. Keyblade Mage (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

"Undo" or "manually" its the same thing. You kept on changing it back to the same thing over and over again. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I thought...Well it doesn't matter, mister. You're in trouble too. You're using multiple names. You say that you're the one who warned me, but it was done with a different name. Keyblade Mage (talk) 23:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

I hate to disappoint you, but this is the only account I have. The other editor warned you on an article's talk page, but it is more customary to warn someone on their user talk page. However, that does not negate the fact that they did warn you and you continued to revert. Besides, a warning on your talk page serves as a record that you have been warned. The one on the article's talk page will eventually get buried under future edits. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know I just f***ed up. Sorry, It looked like you were replying to yourself, but then I saw. You see, I don't look at talks going from one talk page to another, so that was my mistake. Then, I looked back and forth, and I had to smack myself a few times. Sorry, buddy, but you know, I'd be ready to just forget today, if you are. Maybe just try to start over with each other? Oh, and to put you at ease, I'm not a n00b here. I just don't take the time to read guidelines...;)Anyway, what exactly was your problem on those pages, anyway? I maen...is'nt that stuff obvious? Keyblade Mage (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

August 2008[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 00:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SWEET! Lol... Wait, my page doesn't count, does it?Keyblade Mage (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Keyblade Mage[reply]

I would be happy to start over. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 16:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be certain that this does not happen again, Mage, I've got a list of policies that I highly suggest you read. I know you don't take the time to read guidelines, but at least read the "nutshell" box at the top.

Oh, and if you see a huge hidden note, like the one that was present on Katara's page, I suggest you ask the talk page, because hidden notes aren't there randomly.--haha169 (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Huh, you'd think sombody would have just put that in for kicks! (Sarcasim, duh). Anyway, I didn't actually see that hidden message - the way I'd scrolled down, I didn't get to look at it.