User talk:Kges1901/2020/July

Archives

49th Armored Division[edit]

Are you sure about the 4-112th Armor being in Dallas in 1989? This National Guard source says: "Headquarters, 4th Battalion, 112th Armor, 49th Armored Division, Denison, Texas". I have updated the 49th and 50th Armored divisions graphics. Will now update the 49th map and move 1-112 to Dallas. Thank you for your additions, improvements, and corrections. I appreciate your calm and cooperative manner. Best regards, noclador (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Noclador: The biography is at odds with the lineage for 3rd Brigade, 49th Armored Division on p. 386 of Armies, Corps, Divisions and Separate Brigades, where it is noted that HHC of the 4th Battalion, 112th Armored was at Dallas since it assumed that designation. The biography notes that the officer was commander of Detachment 1 of the company, which could very well be accurate as the Detachment could have been at Denison and the rest of the company at Dallas. Often National Guard units had detachments of companies stationed in different towns.
Also, did you find the 1988 New Jersey Adjutant General report online? I've only been able to find a snippet view of it.Kges1901 (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent find about the 4-112th Armor being 100% in Dallas. Well done. Changing the map now. noclador (talk) 11:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project[edit]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between April and June 2020. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

169th FA Bde[edit]

I just noticed that you've claimed credit for destubbing this article. But it's been a start for almost a decade, so what's your reasoning?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the contest creator if articles that had 1.5 kb or less of readable prose that were rated start that I expanded beyond that could be considered destubs and he agreed. This would imply that 'stub' is defined as under 1.5 kb of readable prose pre-expansion rather than strictly a stub assessment. [1] Kges1901 (talk) 01:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had it in my head that the upper limit was 1k. Drive on, MacDuff!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on Hadrian's Wall and Hawkeye7 on the British military
Op-ed: Nick-D on diversity and military history

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ivan Tutarinov.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ivan Tutarinov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nestor Kozin.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nestor Kozin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	For 94th Cavalry Regiment (United States).. Buckshot06 (talk) 13:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]