User talk:Kghakim

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Kghakim. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page George Hakim, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AntiDionysius,

Thank you for bringing to my attention the guidelines concerning conflicts of interest on Wikipedia. I understand the importance of ensuring that content remains objective and factual. My intention was to provide information about our family business brand, as I felt it was missing from the platform. I acknowledge that my initial content may have appeared promotional in nature since it was largely derived from our website.

I want to express my gratitude for the edits you made to the page. Your corrections not only align with Wikipedia's style but also provide me with a clearer understanding of the desired tone and approach. I appreciate the time and effort you invested in maintaining the integrity of the content.

Going forward, I am committed to adhering strictly to Wikipedia's content policies. I will focus on maintaining an objective tone, avoid promotional language, and ensure the content is accurate and verifiable. To ensure transparency and alignment with Wikipedia's guidelines, I will make use of the talk pages for proposing changes and disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Thank you for your understanding, guidance, and valuable contributions.

Best regards,

kghakim Kghakim (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Hakim Jewelers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Hakim Jewelers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Hakim Jewelers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexandermcnabb,

Thank you for informing me about the discussion surrounding the "George Hakim Jewelers" article. I genuinely understand and recognize the concerns that have been raised. When I initially created the page, I leaned heavily on content from our brand's website. In hindsight, I see how this might have been perceived as too promotional, and I sincerely apologize for any oversight.

I'm truly grateful for the collaborative spirit of the Wikipedia community. The edits and guidance I've received thus far have been instrumental in helping me understand the platform's standards better. I'm actively committed to enhancing the article to meet Wikipedia's rigorous criteria for neutrality and verifiability. To this end, I'll be working diligently to source and add credible references, ensuring the content is both accurate and balanced.

Your feedback and the discussion are invaluable to me, and I look forward to participating and addressing any concerns raised by the community. My ultimate goal is to contribute positively to Wikipedia and provide an informative and objective article for readers.

Best regards, Kghakim (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]