User talk:Khaledfooty
Blocked as a sock puppet[edit]
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Khaledfooty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have never vandalised anything on Wikipedia or on any other websites...ever, I'm not immature enough to do such things. I've been on wikipedia for 2-3 months, but have been using it for 5 years, and during those years I have never violated a single wikipedia rule and I have seen the consequences of vandalism so I know better to do such thing, I'm still a newbie when it comes to article editing, so I wouldn't dare to tamper with an article unless I knew what I was doing. To be honest this block seems completely random and absurd, and it has stopped me from updating articles which is pretty annoying as I'm bored usually so I tend to improve articles as best as I can, I request that you unblock me as I have not done anything wrong as I respect wikipedia to much to vandalise it in anyway what so ever, since it has been my source of knowledge for a long time, please take this into consideration.
Decline reason:
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tony254trill/Archive. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have contacted the blocking admin; but you are not blocked for vandalism, but for sockpuppetry. If he is right then you are aware what this means. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 17:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Khaledfooty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
OK so a sock puppet is when someone creates misleading multiple accounts, right?, if so then I can say that I have NEVER created another account, I have stuck to 1 account for as long as I've been on wikipedia, and I have always had 1 email address, I can promise you that I have never had any other accounts EVER. And the only times where I've edited articles without being on this account is when I'm not signed in at all, so you would see my I.p. address recorded instead of my user name when you view histories of articles I have edited.
Decline reason:
Editing the same article as a logged in or IP editor is also WP:SOCK, as it is often used in order to create a false consensus, or to vote multiple times. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.