User talk:Khaleejian

this is muh talk page and you will respect my authoritah Khaleejian (talk) 11:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kuwait City because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Moving pages against consensus

You know that moving any article title from Sabah to something else is controversial and disputed. So, use the process for controversial moves at Wikipedia:Requested moves. DrKiernan (talk) 07:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Anders Feder (talk) 08:46, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

• Please remain calm when talking to other editors and refrain from alleging that someone is taking part in prohibited activities. In a post at Talk:Saudi_Arabian-led_intervention_in_Yemen#Israel.27s_support you called another editor a spammer and accused them of being "butthurt" because they did not retain your version of an article. If someone has reverted or removed something you added and you believe that your version was correct, you need to calmly ask why it was removed and what needs to be done for it to be kept. DO NOT respond with personal attacks, as not only does this make other less inclined to want to work with you but it also puts you at risk of getting blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

• I'd also recommend that you hold off on making a lot of page moves until you are more familiar with editing on Wikipedia. For example, you moved Mubarak Al-Sabah to Mubarak the Great. While he was known under that name, this isn't the most common name for him and typically Wikipedia will only list someone under a different name is they are almost solely known under that title. It's fairly rare for royalty of any type to be listed under anything other than their formal name. Because of this, I'd prefer that rather than move pages of your own accord that you instead open up move requests on the talk pages. Sometimes articles do need to be moved, but sometimes they're at a specific name for a reason and this may not be immediately apparent for newer users. This doesn't mean that you can't, just that I'd recommend that you wait until you're more experienced. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject East Turkestan Islamic Movement

Wikipedia:WikiProject East Turkestan Islamic Movement, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject East Turkestan Islamic Movement and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject East Turkestan Islamic Movement during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mztourist (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mztourist (talk) 08:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Saudi intervention casualties

If you were implying that I have been complicit in addition of BS casualty figures than I'm sorry but that is not the case. I have never condoned addition of unsourced or improperly sourced information. If some BS casualty figures were added in the last day or so and I haven't reverted them than that's because I haven't been active around Wikipedia for more than 24 hours. Now that I did check the article, I did revert an unsourced edit. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Islamic State (ISIS)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Islamic State (ISIS), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Islamic State (ISIS) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Islamic State (ISIS) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)