User talk:Khtibkiarash

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Kiava per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 02:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khtibkiarash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

im not that user you mention it how can i proof ? Khtibkiarash (talk) 02:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We don't unblock suspected sockpuppets just because they deny the allegations ... if we did, we might as well never block anyone over it to begin with. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Khtibkiarash (talk) 02:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 Renamer note:

Your explanation for using multiple accounts is not compatible with a review of events.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Oh, in the unblock request you claim not to be that user. In the rename request, you claimed to use two accounts due to a lost login. Food for thought.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

I didn't tell im aliasghar ghorbabdokht

Still im saying admins make a bigmistake you can check ip . Just i have main account when blocked i lost my password and i registered again so , listen carefully im not telling im aliasghar ghorbani , just my main account is kiava ok? Khtibkiarash (talk) 11:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

I noted this on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks , because if they check , im not that person then they should unblock me because i never make mistakes just for one article and i said i will promise i dont make mistakes anytime . Because just for one , one article i made mistakes i wrote.

I know i shouldn't make user but just user @khtibkiarash is mine because i lost my access after block my main account but now im telling this is my account and why i created so if they unblock my account i just want tranfer any information or pages i created with new user to my main account @kiava

I dont have any account just this accounts is mine Khtibkiarash (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 10:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)