User talk:Kidtommee

Xing Xing Digital moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Xing Xing Digital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingenuity Well I Need Help With Adding A Template 75.118.96.98 (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which template would you like help with? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Xing Xing Template Because I Don't Know How To Add Templates Yet! Kidtommee (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean an infobox? If so, you can find a guide on how to create them here. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yeah well xing xing digital shutted down back in 2018 so I will add it into the infobox Kidtommee (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Now Know How To Put Info Box! Kidtommee (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at HIT Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I Guess 😕 Kidtommee (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not only are you edit-warring, you are also unable to cite your changes. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Just Don't Like It When People Think HiT Entertainment Died In 2016 Kidtommee (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like it when people think that then maybe it would be useful to cite a source for your changes. Best Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xing Xing Digital (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xing Xing Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kidtommee! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xing Xing Digital (October 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If you continue to re-submit it without making changes, you will lose access.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xing Xing Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 00:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xing Xing Digital (October 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Numberguy6 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No changes made since last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xing Xing Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For Example Whenever Someone Thinks HiT Entertainment Was Defunct On 2016, It Sounds Fake (It Is Technically Fake Because

Its Mostly A Unit Now) I Have To Tell Them To Just Don't Make Fun Of Me Kidtommee (talk) 21:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is making fun of you, all I am saying is that you should you cite your sources when including such information. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Need A Turtorial First Kidtommee (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps WP:CITE would be helpful. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry If The Edit Is Still Unsourced But I Am New To Wikipedia Kidtommee (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do understand that you are new to Wikipedia, but restoring content that is unsourced is problematic, so, before restoring it, you should look at the link to the tutorial about citing sources. Best Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Mostly Use A Samsung Tablet So I Think It Would Be Better If I Do It On A Computer Kidtommee (talk) 22:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But Where Is It? Kidtommee (talk) 22:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a second, shouldn't we be discussing this at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents#User:Kidtommee? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Yeah Right Kidtommee (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you know that the content is unsourced then don't restore it. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Still Going To Restore It So Don't Restore Your Edit Kidtommee (talk) 22:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you continue to restore unsourced content, you will not get your wish fullfilled. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I Need To Semi Protect It Entirely So Nobody Can Add It Back To Defunct (Not Trying To be Rude Or Something) Kidtommee (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Does Fullfilled Mean Kidtommee (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (HIT Entertainment) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and unsourced edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be clear that if this behavior continues after the block expires you will likely be blocked indefinitely. Other editors are patiently trying to explain the issues and where you can find the information you need. It is your responsibility to learn how to edit correctly. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Does 72 Hours Mean? Kidtommee (talk) 23:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Will Block You Back Kidtommee (talk) 23:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not possible, considering that you are not an admin and neither am I. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop It! Kidtommee (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:CIR or trolling.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Want To Be Blocked Forever Kidtommee (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Kidtommee (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How Long? Kidtommee (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The guide to appealing blocks is linked in the block notice. I strongly suggest you read it, as well as the other feedback you've been given, before requesting an unblock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Ignoring You Because I Can Do Whatever I Want Kidtommee (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please Don't Make It Forever Kidtommee (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Know How It Works Kidtommee (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guess What! The More You Block Me The More You Become Rude! Kidtommee (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

El_C 00:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Xing Xing Digital[edit]

Hello, Kidtommee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xing Xing Digital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Xing Xing Digital[edit]

Hello, Kidtommee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xing Xing Digital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Star Hill Ponies[edit]

The article Star Hill Ponies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]