User talk:Kingston, CA

Welcome!

Hello, Kingston, CA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi, I noticed that Sirlanz is being a very abusive user, going through your edit and reverting everything. He is doing the same thing to me - he went through all my edits and reverted them. I make edits with dry, factual, innocuous education about the names of a scientist's parents[1], or the education of a prominent Facebook (Oculus) engineer [2], and so forth, and he just goes through my edit history, removing this information out of spite, or disruptiveness, or what have you.

In fact he is reverting my edit history again right now. I have reported it to the admin noticeboard, as I don't want his disruptiveness of you, me, and whoever else he is hassling to cause some kind of wiki-wide problem Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Sirlanz .

Minimax Regret (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss[edit]

Hi Please discuss about the add of the mentions. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This thing should be discussed in the article talk page. Kingston, CA (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 weeks for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kingston, CA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have added some important information lacking in the Khartoum City article. I have not added anything but I have done a deep study thorough the history of the old city and I mentioned some details that were not covered by the current edit. How can I be banned and I have not committed any abuse or mistreatment on Wikipedia? At least I'm doing improvements to develop this article, which was I subsequently blocked and banned for no reason.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia can not accept content that is not supported by reliable sources as new content needs to be verifiable, and you have been repeatedly adding large amounts of unsourced content. You would need to address that if you wish to be unblocked, and I suggest you read WP:V and WP:RS first. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the lack of additional sources dosen't allows the access to more extensive information and comprehensively will not meet the needs of the reader in the introduction of content or template, but after reviewing the uses policies for Wikipedia I had realized that it is necessary to add reliable sources and I will try if the block lifted from me and I know that it will not be lifted from me to limit useless edit that do not contain sources. Kingston,CA (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Mukfellas.png[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]