User talk:Kirin4

Censored

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
For the previous version of page, please see here.
(see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks)

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of MagicKirin (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Either you are a sock of a banned user or you've picked a really inappropriate username. Your short history is full of contentious editing, so I suspect it is the former. Ifyou are not a sockpuppet, please select a more appropriate user name which does not resemble that of a banned user and refrain from contentious editing. Thank you. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 02:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kirin4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Gamaliel refuses to discuss, I am being blocked without cause. Wikipedia 5 Pillars are being violated

Decline reason:

Disruptive sockpuppets are not unblocked. Ever. —[[Animum | talk]] 17:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Untrue. I responded to his multiple emails but he didn't get the response he wanted, so he wrote "Then you have just confirmed that censorship exists at Wikipedia". It's clear that this user is determined to be combative and I recommend he stay blocked. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 17:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kirin4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not an abusive Sock Puppet. Gamaliel may hav responded but did not discuss. Refused to hear my side. I stand by the censorship accusation.

Decline reason:

Mmmm, it smells like something I read before at User talk:Kirin2. Unblock denied, you are most probably a sock. — -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.