User talk:Kitsjade9

June 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paul Kitson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 15:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Kitson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. My Pants Metal (talk) 15:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Paul Kitson, you may be blocked from editing. Victor Trevor (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paul Kitson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 15:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to say what goes on on my wikipedia page without my permission Kitsjade9 (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kitsjade9! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Paul Kitson several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Paul Kitson, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]