Jump to content

User talk:Kkmurray/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Activity-based proteomics

Regarding your article "Activity-based proteomics" I would like to point out that the shown structure of the rhodamine derivative is incorrect. It is the substitution pattern at the chromophore. Kind regards, Ruben Bartholomäus (ETH Zürich) 82.130.100.77 (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, but I haven't edited activity-based proteomics much beyond cleanup and most recently flagging it for being too technical and needing sections. The file File:Fp rhodamine.svg is by Ronhjones on WIkimedia Commons. --Kkmurray (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Cathode ray tube is a German invention

German inventor Ferdinand Braun invented Cathode ray tube. 92.74.62.158 (talk) 04:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

You need to take your concerns to the article talk page. Please see WP:BRD and WP:CON. --Kkmurray (talk) 05:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Sierra Jackson

Hi Dr. Murray just stopping by on your talk page.Sjack52 (talk) 05:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Regarding the use of "van der Waals" or "Van der Waals" in text

It is indeed listed as "van der Waals" in "APPENDIX 9-1: recommended spelling list" of "The ACS Style Guide (2006)". However, their recommendation is wrong. The proper way to write Dutch surnames can be found on Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_name#Surnames. This is a matter of writing names correctly.

The same applies to "Van 't Hoff" or "van 't Hoff".

Furthermore, the ACS recommended spelling list is inconsistent: van der Waals VandenHeuvel van’t Hoff–Le Bel (use en dash, see p 124) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.83.182.84 (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

From van (Dutch): "Derivative terms like van der Waals radius (Dutch: vanderwaalsstraal) the "v" is not capitalised, unless it is the first word of the sentence." In any case, you need to take your proposed changes to the article talk pages or WikiProject Chemistry. --Kkmurray (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Methods in Organic Synthesis cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Methods in Organic Synthesis cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. The image was orphaned when Methods in Organic Synthesis was merged into Synthetic Reaction Updates and is no longer needed. --Kkmurray (talk) 22:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Why spell out NMR?

Trying to figure out the motivation to move paramangetic NMR ... to Paramagnetic Nuclear Magnetic .... Might be something that others would want to have a say in?--Smokefoot (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Motivations are WP:ACRONYMTITLE and naming consistency within Category:Nuclear magnetic resonance. The consensus seems to be spelling out NMR in article titles. If that consensus isn't clear or there is a desire for acronym-only or system of mixed acronym/spelled out titles, then there should be a discussion. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Well darn, the time to have that discussion was a few days before the action. Kind of a team sport here in the chem project, or was. When was the last time you discussed a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum? --Smokefoot (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't see how WP:BRD is inconsistent with teamwork. In any case, I started an RFC at WikiProject Chemistry.[1] --Kkmurray (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks. I realized my mistakes soon after I made it, but couldn't fix it. I appreciate your work. Artheartsoul1 (talk) 20:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inlet ionization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fragmentation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Move review for Carbon (fiber)

An editor has asked for a Move review of Carbon (fiber). Because you participated in the move discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the move review. Srnec (talk) 22:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Kkmurray,

I see you have deleted multiple posts from March that I had posted from nanoHUB.org. I do not have any of the original messages sent, but some pages we posted to would be semiconductor, quantum mechanics, etc. What should we do differently to keep posts up?

Thanks,

ToriToristevoo1223 (talk) 17:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

I only see one contribution from User:Toristevoo1223, but presumably you mean the many links to nanohub.org that are being added to article external links sections. You should be aware that Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files (WP:NOTREPOSITORY). See Wikipedia:External links: external links to a site that does not provide a unique resource are not appropriate. The content should be added to expand the article. --Kkmurray (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fluorescence in the life sciences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Annual Reports Section B cover.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Annual Reports Section B cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Annual Reports Section C cover.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Annual Reports Section C cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

OK. Article merge to Annual Reports on the Progress of Chemistry left orphan images. Thanks. --Kkmurray (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

External Links removed from "Physics Education" page

Hello!

I am new to wiki-editing, so I wondered if perhaps I stepped on a rule or something. In my recent additions to the page "Physics Education", under the "Major areas of research" I included some external links within the paragraph text to different curriculum web-pages.

I see that they have been tagged as "dead links" and removed. Was this because it was inappropriate to have external links in the paragraph text? Should they have been references instead?

They certainly were live, I tested them and they led to the right pages...

Thanks!

15:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)~

Caleb July 17 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caleb.speirs (talk • contribs) 15:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

The guidelines are at WP:NOTLINK and WP:EL. Concepts should be integrated into the body of the article; unique resources that can't be integrated are potential external links. A good rule from WP:ELNO is that "one should generally avoid providing external links to any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article." --Kkmurray (talk) 01:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Change in your user rights

Your Wikipedia account was previously granted a user right called "course instructor" by the Wiki Education Foundation. That right enabled you to create a course page through the EducationProgram MediaWiki extension. Starting in fall 2015, the Wiki Education Foundation has discontinued its use of this extension. Going forward, users should create course pages through the Wiki Education Foundation website. That application is more user-friendly, and any content is automatically mirrored to Wikipedia. To prevent confusion, we'll be removing your "course instructor" user right, as it is not needed with the new system. This is simply a notification of the technical change to your account. No action is needed from you at this time.

If you plan on teaching with Wikipedia for the fall 2015 term, please email me (helaine@wikiedu.org) for instructions how to create your next course page using our new system. --Helaine (Wiki Ed) (talk), sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of optofluidics researchers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Display and Lens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Chemistry handout

Hi. Wiki Ed is preparing to print a handbook to help student editors working with chemistry articles in higher education across the USA and Canada. You can find the draft text here. I'd really appreciate input from other editors on the Talk page. We've already reached out to WikiProject Chemistry, but I would be interested in your feedback, as an experienced instructor. Any feedback is especially helpful prior to Nov. 13 (this Friday). Thanks! Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Department of the Gulf

Thanks for adding the additional references to the page. I'm working on Winfield Scott Edgerly. When I looked for the department (ones of his last commands), I found it was a redirect to Army of the Gulf. I didn't realize that your internal text used the word "Department," so I turned the redirect into an article. I hope I haven't confused anything you had on your to-do list. I don't know right now if the department on "my" page traces its lineage to the department on "your" page. The Army probably doesn't know either. More research to follow. Regards, Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 03:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Are they the same Departments or should there be a DAB page? --Kkmurray (talk) 14:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
I think they're the same and we should probably treat them like the Department of Texas. Maybe a merge, which I don't know how to do?--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
If it is the same entity, it can be one article. A DAB is probably needed in any case since there was a Confederate Department of the Gulf (see Dabney_H._Maury#Civil_War) Here is Dyar on the Union Department: Dyer's Compendium (Union) Western Departments and Armies. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed --Kkmurray (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forbidden mechanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glow in the dark. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Mass spectrometry template

Dear K K Murray,

In the template {{mass spectrometry}}, you removed the item "NEMS" which I added recently. You said in the comment "reverted good faith edit. That is a size of a mass spectrometer, not a type". Well, at least thank you for the "good faith".

I am afraid that this is a misunderstanding. NEMS-MS does not mean a microminiaturised mass spectrometer (as e.g. developed by the UK start-up Microsaic, see Miniature mass spectrometer). It refers to a new kind of analysis by detecting the frequency shift caused by the adsorption of the particles on a NEMS resonator. I invite you to consider the articles cited in the stub I created Nanoelectromechanical systems mass spectrometer (and to which the item "NEMS" on the template was linked).

It is not (yet?) a commercial instrument, but I think it deserves being mentioned in the Wiki encyclopedia. It is being developed by several research groups.

Would you consider undo your removal?

Thanks for your attention, Ileresolu (talk) 09:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. I thought that you meant a MEMS based mass spectrometer. I didn't realize that nanoresonator mass measurement devices were being referred to as mass spectrometers, but it has made it to the secondary MS literature (e.g. doi:10.1002/mas.21495). This doesn't fit the IUPAC definition of mass spectrometer, but the question of where mass spectrometry stops and particle size and mass measurement begins seems to be an open one. --Kkmurray (talk) 13:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

FAB Edits

Hi Dr. Murray, I fixed a couple of grammatical errors and added a few links to the FAB article. May need to add a citation to the sentence "This is a potent inhibitor of mitochodrial ATPase activity" (at the very end of the article). Nick.magazine (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Countercurrent chromatography
added a link pointing to Stationary phase
Nanopore
added a link pointing to Pore
Tetramer
added a link pointing to Subunit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kkmurray. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


Laser

Dear KKmurray, Undid revision 755541131 by Kkmurray (talk) look at the ZM-87 link in wikipedia, you can read it there - (the link in the refered line) --188.171.58.181 (talk) 21:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

See my response on your talk page: [2] --Kkmurray (talk) 23:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, my links you removed provide actually photos of the Southwest Louisiana Refuge Complex and Sabine National Wildlife Refuge. The photos are not some random photo of a duck taken in Missouri to depict a duck photo on Sabine NWR for instance. All my wildlife photos are taken mostly on Sabine NWR, Cameron Prairie NWR, and Lacassine NWR otherwise known as the SWLA Refuge Complex. Removing the links, I feel, would be limiting viewers to the 2 or 3 photos on the page. Were I have hundreds of photos in my portfolio taken directly on the property. Thank you All these pintails were taken at the Complex: http://www.jamiebeauxisphotography.com/Animals/Northern-Pintail — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.7.215.165 (talk) 22:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

If you have hundreds of photos, why don't you upload a few of them to Wikimedia Commons? For external links guidelines, see Wikipedia:External links .--Kkmurray (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Aerosol bomb

An article that you have been involved in editing—Aerosol bomb —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chuntuk (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitrogen–phosphorus detector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sensitivity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philippines Campaign (1941–42), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph H. Moore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halstead C. Fowler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinguished Service Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kkmurray. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-mass-spec

Template:Collab-mass-spec has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

I created this template in 2007 as part of WP:WikiProject Mass spectrometry and it was never used as far as I know. --Kkmurray (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Henry William Brown Template Use

I noticed you've used Template:Top_US_World_War_II_Aces for Henry William Brown, an article you created, despite the fact that the body of the article explicitly states that he was credited with 14 enemies destroyed in the air. The template should not be used in a way that makes aircraft destroyed on the ground inclusive, since the template specifies aerial victories. Cheers, Finktron (talk) 10:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Who is "Henry W. Brown (17.2)" in Template:Top US World War II Aces? Typo? --Kkmurray (talk) 12:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This may well be a typo, since the sources in the article itself, Mustang Aces of the Eight Air Force and the website link to the American Air Museum, list Henry Brown with 14.2 confirmed. I'll remove him from the template. Cheers, Finktron (talk) 13:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Probably the 3 damaged were added to the 14.2 aerial to get the 17.2. All of the references I found indicate 14.2 or 14.5. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 370th Fighter Group, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages First Army and Bradley Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Jonathan Jackson Christian Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Philippines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kkmurray. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Chembox assistance

Howdy! Based on some of your recent edits and your interest in the Chemistry Project, I'm hoping you might be interested in helping me out with something. I'm working on building a {{Infobox}} based replacement for {{Chembox}}. I have a working proof of concept at {{Infobox chemical}}. Looking for some expert opinions and feedback. If you have any interest, please let me know. Feel free to disregard this message. :-) (P.S. Happy thanksgiving if you are in the USA!) --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Jan Van Deemter.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kkmurray/Archive_5&oldid=1139240032"