User talk:Kleptotoid
Welcome![edit]
Hi Kleptotoid! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:15, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Mud bath appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- I cited my sources on its effectiveness in treating arthritis with proper medical journals. I removed the information that presented this article as an advertisement. Please calrify exactly what was a minority or fringe viewpoint as everything I corrected was sufficiently sourced. If need be, I will provide more sources. Kleptotoid (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- It makes claims about
It works by allowing the skin to absorb nutrients in the mud
but it is not a medical source. See wp:MEDRS. That's not acceptable on Wikipedia. Adakiko (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)- I will add more reputable sources then if that would be acceptable. Kleptotoid (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that per WP:BRD you should go to the article's talk page and explain why the changes should be introduced in the article and to get a consensus for your edits before trying to reinsert them into the article. Continuing to reinsert the changes repeatedly once you know there is a disagreement is edit warring and could result in being blocked from editing. Please also note that while edit warring in general can lead to a block, there is a bright-line rule known as WP:3RR: you cannot make more than 3 reverts within a 24 hour period (not that you can go up to 3 and still avoid a block but this is a bright-line rule that shows concentrated and immediately actionable edit warring). Thanks. - Aoidh (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I'll do that now. Kleptotoid (talk) 19:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that per WP:BRD you should go to the article's talk page and explain why the changes should be introduced in the article and to get a consensus for your edits before trying to reinsert them into the article. Continuing to reinsert the changes repeatedly once you know there is a disagreement is edit warring and could result in being blocked from editing. Please also note that while edit warring in general can lead to a block, there is a bright-line rule known as WP:3RR: you cannot make more than 3 reverts within a 24 hour period (not that you can go up to 3 and still avoid a block but this is a bright-line rule that shows concentrated and immediately actionable edit warring). Thanks. - Aoidh (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- I will add more reputable sources then if that would be acceptable. Kleptotoid (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- It makes claims about