User talk:KnightWarrior25
KnightWarrior25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Firstly I am sorry because i violate WP:3RR, sir this is because I am not aware of this rule as I joined wiki only 27 days ago till an Administrator has blocked me for 24 Hours for WP:3RR . I feel sorry and promise that I will not involve in an WP:WAR In future in any case. Secondly sir I have only reverted POV Pusher User:TripWire and before reverting him I discussed it on Talk:Kargil War. Sir is this block is only because I presented my claims on RFC @ Talk:Kargil War with Numerous Neutral Sources? According To WP:POV an editor is said to be A POV Pusher when he is editing with his point of view without any source? I presented Almost 15-20 Neutral Source For Decisive Indian Victory in Talk page - @Kargil War InfoBox. And Reverted Thrice User:TripWire as per as Talk Page. I only debated in Talk:Kargil War in simple manner, I Respected other Editors, I Neither Personally attacked Anyone Nor Attacked anyone in anyway just debated and presented my Claim with Numerous Neutral Sources.
Thirdly, When i created my account, The Next day i received one message that you are been found sock of User:Astral Prince although the case is closed and they all agreed to me that i have not made any other account. Even Today i see my Talk Page That you are blocked for POV Pushing and also you have socks. Don't Mind sir but i challenge anyone to prove that i have any sock. Even if you say i am ready to share my IP with administrators and administrators can match my IP with anyone whom they are thinking of sock of myn. That's all i wanted to say. And i request administrators to UnBlock me because i have not Violate any Wikipedia Policies except WP:WAR and because of this an administrator has blocked me for 24Hours and i didn't Appeal that block only because i have violated WP:WAR but then i haven't Involve in an WP:WAR just reverted User:TripWire once as per as Talk Page. But still i am blocked? Is this a crime of being an Wikipedian? KnightWarrior25 (talk) 06:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Reviewing admins: please note that this unblock request is so similar to that of Tejas MRCA (talk · contribs) they are almost certainly the same person. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome[edit]
Hello KnightWarrior25 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Faizan (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Astral Prince, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Longewala, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Faizan (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- The sources you cited are not relaible. A reliable source is one, which can be trusted. These are not. Indian POV, unattributed text. Faizan (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
will provide more sources later, but how can you write 20 soldiers in the casuilty2 section, whole worlds knows about 200 pakistani soldiers killed, See aftermath @ Battle of Longewala. and Topays is not an Indian site, [1] and see you are the one who erased 200 and writed 20 there. KnightWarrior25 (talk) 16:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
References
Talkback[edit]
Message added 07:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Faizan (talk) 07:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —TripWire talk 17:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.—TripWire talk 17:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
July 2015[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —Darkwind (talk) 22:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KnightWarrior25, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Faizan (talk) 13:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom appeal[edit]
Editor has appealed to ArbCom and was unblocked; they chose to continue editing with their more recent account, MBlaze Lightning (talk · contribs). Drmies (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)