User talk:Koekani

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Konnie Huq, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gwernol 21:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Konnie Huq, you will be blocked from editing. _Talk Islander 22:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Barack Obama. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)why do you think it is wrong to put his father's religion with him????religion is important for barak that's why he is participating in religious forum as he did last night. so what's wrong in putting his father's religion then???or are you just muslim hater???[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Loonymonkey (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above warning, please don't add content to a biography of a living person without including sources. PhilKnight (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhi

i removed the reference about international day of non violence because in the article this reference is an attempt to give an impression that this day is because of gandhi while there is no direct relation between the two so it is in a way cheating to add this sentence.so please don't try to put it back.