User talk:Komal Lopez

Welcome!

Hello, Komal Lopez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Komal Lopez (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Komal Lopez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Komal Lopez, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Komal Lopez (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Komal Lopez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratham Shiksha (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratham Shiksha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Komal Lopez, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Joseph2302 (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pratham Shiksha concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pratham Shiksha, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pratham Shiksha

Hello, Komal Lopez. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pratham Shiksha".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm ^talk 11:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi there, my article on Pratham Shiksha has been deleted from my sandbox. I plan to repost the article with more relevant external links to support the text. Should I rewrite the article on a fresh page or the previous article can be reworked upon.

Please suggest the way ahead.

Komal Lopez (talk) 10:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your first step would be to go to user talk:Mojo Hand and ask the administrator who deleted the draft to restore it. Include a link to the draft so they remember which one it was. This should be quite straightforward as it was a deletion for inactivity. On another subject, except in special cases, you can create a page where another one was deleted. However, if the page was deleted because it had problem (not the case here) and your new version has the same problems, the new version will be deleted. Hope that helps! Happy Squirrel (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You gave no in-line references at all. I looked at the external links posted at the bottom. One was to the company itself, two were quoting company management and one was someone's personal web page, so none would be acceptable even if they had been used as references. They were not in-line anyway, so we can't tell what fact each was supposed to be supporting
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: contribute towards enhancing the level and spread of education in India... The objective is to make an effort and contribute towards improving the level and spread of education in Indian society... Proper well- equipped classrooms... for comfort of the students... provided with a loving and nurturing environment... well-qualified teachers... instrumental in providing... students to discover and enrich their capabilities and talent... will equip children with skills to move ahead in life and earn a livelihood for themselves... The school has been recently recognized as the best school in NGO Category at Make In India Awards for Excellence – 2015 for its contribution in social development.
it's all about what the school's aspirations and vague spammy claims. To show notability you need hard facts such as the number of staff, funding or expenditure.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to the school website.

If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. The nature of your edits on this and related articles gives the impression that you have a financial stake in promoting this topic, and are directly or indirectly employed by the school. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Komal Lopez. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Komal Lopez|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. It's not the worse I've seen, and if you want to try again, I'll post the deleted text to a user subpage for you to work on, just let me know. I suggest that you look at other school articles to get an idea of layout and referencing. You don't have to use the fancy reference templates, just <ref>[url description]</ref> for web refs or <ref>[publication details]</ref> for books etc will do. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]